Brian Rosebury

555 total citations
19 papers, 172 citations indexed

About

Brian Rosebury is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cognitive Neuroscience and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Brian Rosebury has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 172 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 5 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Brian Rosebury's work include Themes in Literature Analysis (5 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers) and Free Will and Agency (4 papers). Brian Rosebury is often cited by papers focused on Themes in Literature Analysis (5 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers) and Free Will and Agency (4 papers). Brian Rosebury collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Brian Rosebury's co-authors include Claudia Card, Ishtiyaque Haji and Dabney Townsend and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

In The Last Decade

Brian Rosebury

13 papers receiving 103 citations

Peers

Brian Rosebury
Lara Denis United States
Patrick R. Frierson United States
Stephen de Wijze United Kingdom
D. S. Mannison Australia
Lawrence J. Jost United States
Christopher W. Gowans United States
Aurel Kolnai United Kingdom
Mary Gregor United Kingdom
José Medina United States
Brian Rosebury
Citations per year, relative to Brian Rosebury Brian Rosebury (= 1×) peers Iris Murdoch

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Rosebury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Rosebury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Rosebury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Rosebury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Rosebury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Rosebury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Rosebury. The network helps show where Brian Rosebury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian Rosebury

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian Rosebury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian Rosebury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian Rosebury. Brian Rosebury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Rosebury, Brian. (2015). The Theory of the Offender's Forfeited Right. Criminal Justice Ethics. 34(3). 259–283. 1 indexed citations
2.
Rosebury, Brian. (2014). J. R. R. Tolkien’s Double Worlds and Creative Process: Language and Life. The European Legacy. 19(3). 409–410.
3.
Rosebury, Brian. (2011). The Political Logic of Victim Impact Statements. Criminal Justice Ethics. 30(1). 39–67. 1 indexed citations
4.
Rosebury, Brian. (2011). Moore’s Moral Facts and the Gap in the Retributive Theory. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 5(3). 361–376. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rosebury, Brian. (2009). Private Revenge and its Relation to Punishment. Utilitas. 21(1). 1–21. 4 indexed citations
6.
Rosebury, Brian. (2008). Revenge and Moral Judgement in Tolkien. 5(1). 1–20. 1 indexed citations
7.
Rosebury, Brian. (2008). Respect for Just Revenge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 77(2). 451–471. 2 indexed citations
8.
Rosebury, Brian. (2007). The Lord of the Rings 1954-2004: Scholarship in Honor of Richard E. Blackwelder (review). 4(1). 282–288. 11 indexed citations
9.
Rosebury, Brian. (2003). Tolkien. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 6 indexed citations
10.
Rosebury, Brian. (2001). Why Good Government is not Enough. The Political Quarterly. 72(3). 345–352.
11.
Rosebury, Brian & Ishtiyaque Haji. (2000). Moral Appraisability: Puzzles, Proposals and Perplexities. The Philosophical Review. 109(1). 132–132. 5 indexed citations
12.
Rosebury, Brian. (2000). The historical contingency of aesthetic experience. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 40(1). 73–88. 3 indexed citations
13.
Rosebury, Brian & Claudia Card. (1998). The Unnatural Lottery: Character and Moral Luck.. The Philosophical Review. 107(2). 291–291. 90 indexed citations
14.
Rosebury, Brian. (1997). IRRECOVERABLE INTENTIONS AND LITERARY INTERPRETATION. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 37(1). 15–30. 3 indexed citations
15.
Rosebury, Brian. (1995). Moral Responsibility and "Moral Luck". The Philosophical Review. 104(4). 499–499. 36 indexed citations
16.
Rosebury, Brian. (1992). Tolkien. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks.
17.
Townsend, Dabney & Brian Rosebury. (1989). Art and Desire: A Study of the Aesthetics of Fiction. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 47(4). 389–389. 1 indexed citations
18.
Rosebury, Brian. (1988). Art and Desire. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 1 indexed citations
19.
Rosebury, Brian. (1979). FICTION, EMOTION AND ’BELIEF’: A REPLY TO EVA SCHAPER. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 19(2). 120–130. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026