Candy Tefertiller

428 total citations
15 papers, 286 citations indexed

About

Candy Tefertiller is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Candy Tefertiller has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 286 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Rehabilitation, 10 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Candy Tefertiller's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers). Candy Tefertiller is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (10 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers). Candy Tefertiller collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Candy Tefertiller's co-authors include Arun Jayaraman, Kaitlin Hays, Clare Hartigan, Tamara Bushnik, Gail Forrest, Susan Charlifue, Edelle C. Field‐Fote, Daniel Pinto, Shuo‐Hsiu Chang and Allen W. Heinemann and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy and Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Candy Tefertiller

14 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Candy Tefertiller United States 7 191 138 136 84 28 15 286
Casey Kandilakis United States 7 210 1.1× 194 1.4× 230 1.7× 76 0.9× 18 0.6× 8 337
Steven Knezevic United States 8 209 1.1× 243 1.8× 210 1.5× 107 1.3× 25 0.9× 20 345
Stephen Kornfeld United States 9 261 1.4× 291 2.1× 276 2.0× 132 1.6× 30 1.1× 17 448
Chiung-Ling Chen Taiwan 8 149 0.8× 97 0.7× 44 0.3× 168 2.0× 31 1.1× 14 318
Nina Lefeber Belgium 12 202 1.1× 52 0.4× 138 1.0× 114 1.4× 15 0.5× 26 351
Kaitlin Hays United States 7 142 0.7× 63 0.5× 94 0.7× 67 0.8× 12 0.4× 11 272
Susanne Palmcrantz Sweden 12 218 1.1× 52 0.4× 90 0.7× 108 1.3× 14 0.5× 21 334
Masafumi Mizukami Japan 10 157 0.8× 70 0.5× 100 0.7× 121 1.4× 29 1.0× 37 341
Vivien Jørgensen Norway 9 116 0.6× 202 1.5× 39 0.3× 191 2.3× 22 0.8× 18 307
Laura Wallard France 8 121 0.6× 43 0.3× 84 0.6× 202 2.4× 23 0.8× 21 321

Countries citing papers authored by Candy Tefertiller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Candy Tefertiller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Candy Tefertiller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Candy Tefertiller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Candy Tefertiller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Candy Tefertiller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Candy Tefertiller. The network helps show where Candy Tefertiller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Candy Tefertiller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Candy Tefertiller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Candy Tefertiller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Candy Tefertiller. Candy Tefertiller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Connor, Jane R., Kenneth A. Weber, Dario Pfyffer, et al.. (2025). Reliability of SCIseg Automated Measurement of Midsagittal Tissue Bridges in Spinal Cord Injuries Using an External Dataset. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 31(2). 39–49.
2.
Novack, Thomas A., Yue Zhang, Richard Kennedy, et al.. (2024). Return to Driving Following Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A TBI Model System Longitudinal Investigation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 40(3). 193–202. 1 indexed citations
3.
Novack, Thomas A., Yue Zhang, Richard Kennedy, et al.. (2022). Crash Risk Following Return to Driving After Moderate-to-Severe TBI: A TBI Model Systems Study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 38(3). 268–276. 2 indexed citations
4.
Garnier‐Villarreal, Mauricio, Daniel Pinto, Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty, et al.. (2021). Predicting Duration of Outpatient Physical Therapy Episodes for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury Based on Locomotor Training Strategy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 103(4). 665–675. 6 indexed citations
5.
Nolan, Karen J., et al.. (2021). Utilization of Robotic Exoskeleton for Overground Walking in Acute and Chronic Stroke. Frontiers in Neurorobotics. 15. 689363–689363. 20 indexed citations
6.
Pinto, Daniel, Shuo‐Hsiu Chang, Susan Charlifue, et al.. (2020). Budget impact analysis of robotic exoskeleton use for locomotor training following spinal cord injury in four SCI Model Systems. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 17(1). 4–4. 31 indexed citations
7.
Monden, Kimberley R., Mitch Sevigny, Jessica M. Ketchum, et al.. (2019). Associations Between Insurance Provider and Assistive Technology Use for Computer and Electronic Devices 1 Year After Tetraplegia: Findings From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems National Database. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 100(12). 2260–2266. 4 indexed citations
8.
Heinemann, Allen W., Arun Jayaraman, Chaithanya K. Mummidisetty, et al.. (2018). Experience of Robotic Exoskeleton Use at Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy. 42(4). 256–267. 48 indexed citations
9.
Weintraub, Alan, et al.. (2018). Comparison of the Sensory Organization Test and Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Traumatic Brain Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 99(11). e132–e133. 1 indexed citations
10.
Tefertiller, Candy & Don Gerber. (2017). Step Ergometer Training Augmented With Functional Electrical Stimulation in Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Study. Artificial Organs. 41(11). E196–E202. 4 indexed citations
11.
Tefertiller, Candy, Kaitlin Hays, Arun Jayaraman, et al.. (2017). Initial Outcomes from a Multicenter Study Utilizing the Indego Powered Exoskeleton in Spinal Cord Injury. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 24(1). 78–85. 115 indexed citations
12.
Kahn, Jennifer H., et al.. (2016). Outcome Measure Recommendations From the Spinal Cord Injury EDGE Task Force. Physical Therapy. 96(11). 1832–1842. 15 indexed citations
13.
Hays, Kaitlin, et al.. (2015). Virtual-Reality Based Therapy for Balance Deficits during Traumatic Brain Injury Inpatient Rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 96(10). e44–e44. 1 indexed citations
14.
Kahn, Jennifer H. & Candy Tefertiller. (2014). Measurement Characteristics and Clinical Utility of the 10-Meter Walk Test Among Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 95(5). 1011–1012. 6 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Michael L., et al.. (2012). Activity-based Therapies in Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Focus and Empirical Evidence in Three Independent Programs. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 18(1). 34–42. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026