Eda Gorbis
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 5
- Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 4
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 2
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 2
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 4
- Co-authors
- Karron M. Maidment (3 shared papers)Sanjaya Saxena (2 shared papers)Richard Rosen (1 shared paper)Tanya Vapnik (1 shared paper)Deborah L. Ackerman (1 shared paper)Alexander Bystritsky (1 shared paper)Joseph O’Neill (2 shared papers)Susanna Chang (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Psychiatric Research (1 paper)Molecular Psychiatry (1 paper)The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Aesthetic Nursing (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Eda Gorbis
8 papers receiving 290 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Clinical Psychology 226
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
- Cognitive Neuroscience 101
- Psychiatry and Mental health 69
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 39
Countries citing papers authored by Eda Gorbis
This map shows the geographic impact of Eda Gorbis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eda Gorbis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eda Gorbis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eda Gorbis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eda Gorbis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eda Gorbis. The network helps show where Eda Gorbis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Eda Gorbis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 134 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 |
About Eda Gorbis
Eda Gorbis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cultural Studies, having authored 12 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers), Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications (2 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (226 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (101 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (39 citations). Eda Gorbis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Karron M. Maidment, Sanjaya Saxena, Richard Rosen, Tanya Vapnik, Deborah L. Ackerman, Alexander Bystritsky, Joseph O’Neill, Susanna Chang, Noriko Salamon and Jeffrey M. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychiatric Research, Molecular Psychiatry, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry and Journal of Aesthetic Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.