Eckart Lensch
About
In The Last Decade
Eckart Lensch
6 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 228
- Neurology 202
- Neurology 52
- Rheumatology 48
- Immunology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Eckart Lensch
This map shows the geographic impact of Eckart Lensch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eckart Lensch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eckart Lensch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eckart Lensch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eckart Lensch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eckart Lensch. The network helps show where Eckart Lensch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eckart Lensch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eckart Lensch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eckart Lensch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eckart Lensch. Eckart Lensch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 172 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | Myasthenia gravis after interferon-alpha treatment. | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.