IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia

310 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2019, received 310 indexed citations. Written by David Troilo, Earl Smith, Debora L. Nickla, Regan Ashby, Andrei V. Tkatchenko, Lisa A. Ostrin, Timothy J. Gawne, Machelle T. Pardue, Jody A. Summers and Chea‐su Kee covering the research area of Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (247 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (212 citations) and Ophthalmology (184 citations). Published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Countries where authors are citing IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the IMI – Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-25967.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026