Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050
20163.2k citationsBrien A. Holden, Tim Fricke et al.profile →
Myopia
2020488 citationsEarl Smith, Padmaja Sankaridurg et al.profile →
Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a meta‐analysis and systematic review
2017379 citationsPadmaja Sankaridurg, Thomas Naduvilath et al.profile →
Potential Lost Productivity Resulting from the Global Burden of Myopia
2018302 citationsTim Fricke, Kevin D. Frick et al.profile →
IMI – Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression Report
2019279 citationsChristine F. Wildsoet, Pauline Cho et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Scienceprofile →
IMI Risk Factors for Myopia
2021262 citationsLisa A. Ostrin, J. Willem L. Tideman et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Scienceprofile →
Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling
2018222 citationsTim Fricke, Monica Jong et al.profile →
Time Outdoors in Reducing Myopia
2022124 citationsPadmaja Sankaridurg, Thomas Naduvilath et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Padmaja Sankaridurg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Padmaja Sankaridurg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Padmaja Sankaridurg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Padmaja Sankaridurg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Padmaja Sankaridurg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Padmaja Sankaridurg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Padmaja Sankaridurg. The network helps show where Padmaja Sankaridurg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Padmaja Sankaridurg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Padmaja Sankaridurg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Padmaja Sankaridurg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Padmaja Sankaridurg. Padmaja Sankaridurg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sankaridurg, Padmaja, David A. Berntsen, Mark A. Bullimore, et al.. (2023). IMI 2023 Digest. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 64(6). 7–7.62 indexed citations
Naidoo, Kovin, Tim Fricke, Padmaja Sankaridurg, et al.. (2017). Estimated global productivity loss from myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 2404–2404.
8.
Sankaridurg, Padmaja, Ravi C. Bakaraju, Judith K. Morgan, et al.. (2017). Novel contact lenses designed to slow progress of myopia: 12 month results. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 2391–2391.4 indexed citations
9.
Wilson, David A., Monica Jong, Padmaja Sankaridurg, et al.. (2016). A global generational shift in myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 2468–2468.1 indexed citations
10.
Jong, Monica, Ravi C. Bakaraju, Xiang Chen, et al.. (2015). A dose-response relationship between duration of daily lens wear and reduction in rate of axial elongation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 2941–2941.2 indexed citations
11.
Li, Li, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Thomas Naduvilath, et al.. (2013). What is the ‘real’ baseline for the rate of progress of myopia for a child?The rate of progress of myopia with and without spectacle vision correction. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 5718–5718.1 indexed citations
12.
Holden, Brien A., Padmaja Sankaridurg, Percy Lazon de la Jara, et al.. (2012). Decreasing Peripheral Hyperopia With Distance-centre Relatively-plus Powered Periphery Contact Lenses Reduced The Rate Of Progress Of Myopia: A 5 Year Vision Crc Study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 6300–6300.6 indexed citations
13.
Bakaraju, Ravi C., Cathleen Fedtke, Klaus Ehrmann, et al.. (2012). Validation of Accommodative Responses Measured with the EyeMapper. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 1354–1354.2 indexed citations
14.
Holden, Brien A., Padmaja Sankaridurg, Arthur Ho, et al.. (2011). Central And Peripheral Visual Performance Of A Novel Contact Lens Designed To Control Progression Of Myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 6518–6518.4 indexed citations
15.
Skotnitsky, Cheryl, Deborah F. Sweeney, Thomas Naduvilath, & Padmaja Sankaridurg. (2005). The Incidence of Local and General Contact Lens Induced Papillary Conjunctivitis in Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 2064–2064.3 indexed citations
16.
Willcox, Mark, Nerida Cole, Emma B.H. Hume, et al.. (2004). Contact lenses coated with protamine reduce bacterial adhesion and the production of Contact Lens Induced Acute Red Eye (CLARE). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1568–1568.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.