Earl H. Nash

19 total papers · 1.0k total citations
18 papers, 786 citations indexed

About

Earl H. Nash is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Earl H. Nash has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 786 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Applied Psychology and 4 papers in General Psychology. Recurrent topics in Earl H. Nash's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers). Earl H. Nash is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (5 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers). Earl H. Nash collaborates with scholars based in United States. Earl H. Nash's co-authors include Anthony R. Stone, Stanley D. Imber, Jerome D. Frank, Rudolf Hoehn‐Saric, Lester H. Gliedman, Donald G. Wargo, Charles B. Truax, David Rosenthal and John Neustadt and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

In The Last Decade

Earl H. Nash

17 papers receiving 534 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Earl H. Nash 593 255 99 86 74 18 786
Henry Bachrach 612 1.0× 234 0.9× 106 1.1× 104 1.2× 49 0.7× 20 751
Suzanne W. Hadley 543 0.9× 292 1.1× 82 0.8× 83 1.0× 49 0.7× 11 782
Susan C. Vaughan 574 1.0× 280 1.1× 45 0.5× 64 0.7× 67 0.9× 31 841
Beverly Gomes-Schwartz 803 1.4× 222 0.9× 56 0.6× 60 0.7× 36 0.5× 14 870
Fred R. Staples 611 1.0× 183 0.7× 70 0.7× 210 2.4× 54 0.7× 30 873
David F. Ricks 448 0.8× 289 1.1× 97 1.0× 171 2.0× 53 0.7× 16 869
Diana Fosha 604 1.0× 317 1.2× 43 0.4× 37 0.4× 51 0.7× 27 757
Helene Amundsen Nissen‐Lie 661 1.1× 337 1.3× 86 0.9× 64 0.7× 36 0.5× 41 790
Tomasz P. Andrusyna 522 0.9× 194 0.8× 86 0.9× 63 0.7× 26 0.4× 12 666
Normund Wong 549 0.9× 166 0.7× 59 0.6× 81 0.9× 68 0.9× 11 647

Countries citing papers authored by Earl H. Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Earl H. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Earl H. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Earl H. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Earl H. Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Earl H. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Earl H. Nash. The network helps show where Earl H. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Earl H. Nash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Earl H. Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Earl H. Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Earl H. Nash. Earl H. Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026