E. Zapretilina
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Topics
- Superconducting Materials and Applications (23 papers)Magnetic confinement fusion research (17 papers)Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- RussiaSwitzerlandFrance
In The Last Decade
E. Zapretilina
26 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Biomedical Engineering 270
- Aerospace Engineering 177
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 145
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 71
- Condensed Matter Physics 64
Countries citing papers authored by E. Zapretilina
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Zapretilina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Zapretilina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Zapretilina more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Zapretilina
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Zapretilina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Zapretilina. The network helps show where E. Zapretilina may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Zapretilina
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Zapretilina. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Zapretilina based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Zapretilina. E. Zapretilina is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Design of the ITER magnets to provide plasma operational flexibility | 1 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 47 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | The effect of the feedback controller on superconducting tokamak AC losses | 2 |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Test results for the high field conductor of the ITER central solenoid model coil | 29 |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About E. Zapretilina
E. Zapretilina is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Superconducting Materials and Applications (23 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (17 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (145 citations), Aerospace Engineering (177 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (270 citations). E. Zapretilina has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include D. Bessette, P. Bruzzone, N. Mitchell, G. Vécsey, A.M. Fuchs, B. Stepanov, R. Zanino, H. Takigami, C. Sborchia and R. Wesche. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity and Cryogenics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.