E. T. Mirgule

733 total citations
53 papers, 520 citations indexed

About

E. T. Mirgule is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, E. T. Mirgule has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 520 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 25 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 20 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in E. T. Mirgule's work include Nuclear physics research studies (49 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (22 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (21 papers). E. T. Mirgule is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (49 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (22 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (21 papers). E. T. Mirgule collaborates with scholars based in India, Brazil and United States. E. T. Mirgule's co-authors include Suresh Kumar, D. R. Chakrabarty, V. M. Datar, A. Mitra, B. K. Nayak, V. Nanal, A. Saxena, P. C. Rout, S. Santra and R. K. Choudhury and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

E. T. Mirgule

53 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. T. Mirgule India 14 493 207 150 90 45 53 520
H. Q. Zhang China 8 572 1.2× 332 1.6× 148 1.0× 81 0.9× 24 0.5× 17 580
J. Hasper Germany 10 460 0.9× 198 1.0× 194 1.3× 68 0.8× 103 2.3× 22 493
G. S. F. Stephans United States 16 580 1.2× 219 1.1× 186 1.2× 98 1.1× 47 1.0× 42 601
L. I. Govor Russia 10 426 0.9× 206 1.0× 182 1.2× 70 0.8× 60 1.3× 45 469
K. Govaert Russia 12 517 1.0× 221 1.1× 246 1.6× 140 1.6× 60 1.3× 13 555
Krishichayan United States 13 322 0.7× 97 0.5× 165 1.1× 93 1.0× 46 1.0× 42 371
Tomohiro Oishi Japan 11 256 0.5× 151 0.7× 149 1.0× 81 0.9× 31 0.7× 37 361
Masahiro Nakano Japan 13 523 1.1× 186 0.9× 165 1.1× 130 1.4× 54 1.2× 60 557
J. Klug Germany 13 372 0.8× 122 0.6× 259 1.7× 154 1.7× 44 1.0× 33 474
D. Galaviz Germany 16 567 1.2× 195 0.9× 249 1.7× 88 1.0× 25 0.6× 50 625

Countries citing papers authored by E. T. Mirgule

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. T. Mirgule's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. T. Mirgule with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. T. Mirgule more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. T. Mirgule

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. T. Mirgule. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. T. Mirgule. The network helps show where E. T. Mirgule may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. T. Mirgule

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. T. Mirgule. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. T. Mirgule based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. T. Mirgule. E. T. Mirgule is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mohanto, G., P. C. Rout, K. Ramachandran, et al.. (2020). Effect of nuclear structure and fissility on quasifission. Physical review. C. 102(4). 2 indexed citations
2.
Nayak, B. K., S. V. Suryanarayana, A. Pal, et al.. (2019). Determination of Mn53(n,xp) cross sections using the surrogate reaction ratio method. Physical review. C. 100(5). 5 indexed citations
3.
Pal, Ayan, S. V. Suryanarayana, S. Santra, et al.. (2019). Determination of Ni59(n,xp) reaction cross sections using surrogate reactions. Physical review. C. 99(1). 9 indexed citations
4.
Mukherjee, S., A. Chatterjee, N. L. Singh, et al.. (2018). Neutron emission in F19-induced reactions. Physical review. C. 97(3). 1 indexed citations
5.
Patel, D., S. Mukherjee, N. Deshmukh, et al.. (2017). Influence of breakup on elastic and α-production channels in the 6 Li+ 116 Sn reaction. Chinese Physics C. 41(10). 104001–104001. 1 indexed citations
6.
Patel, D., S. Mukherjee, D. C. Biswas, et al.. (2015). Investigation of the threshold anomaly for theLi7+Tb159system. Physical Review C. 91(5). 5 indexed citations
7.
Tripathi, R., S. Sodaye, K. Sudarshan, et al.. (2015). Fission fragment mass distributions inCl35+Sm144,154reactions. Physical Review C. 92(2). 23 indexed citations
8.
Danu, L. S., B. K. Nayak, E. T. Mirgule, R. K. Choudhury, & U. Garg. (2014). Role of neutron transfer on fusion barrier distributions of theSi28,30 + Sn124systems. Physical Review C. 89(4). 4 indexed citations
9.
Rout, P. C., D. R. Chakrabarty, V. M. Datar, et al.. (2013). Measurement of the Damping of the Nuclear Shell Effect in the Doubly MagicPb208Region. Physical Review Letters. 110(6). 62501–62501. 17 indexed citations
10.
Mirgule, E. T., D. R. Chakrabarty, V. M. Datar, et al.. (2010). Unusual feature ofαspectra in theC12+Nb93reaction near Coulomb barrier energies. Physical Review C. 82(6). 2 indexed citations
11.
Mitra, A., D. R. Chakrabarty, V. M. Datar, et al.. (2010). Broad structures inγ-ray multiplicity gatedpandαspectra in low energy12C+93Nb and16O+89Y reactions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 4004–4004. 2 indexed citations
12.
Chakrabarty, D. R., V. M. Datar, Suresh Kumar, et al.. (2010). Inhomogeneous and intrinsic damping of giant dipole resonance in hot rotating nuclei withA∼ 150. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 37(5). 55105–55105. 15 indexed citations
13.
Chakrabarty, D. R., V. M. Datar, Suresh Kumar, et al.. (2008). Structure inE1strength distribution built on the 15.1 MeVT=1state inC12. Physical Review C. 77(5). 1 indexed citations
14.
Mirgule, E. T., et al.. (2006). Proton and alpha evaporation spectra in low energy 12C and 16O induced reactions. Pramana. 67(2). 369–374. 2 indexed citations
15.
Datar, V. M., Suresh Kumar, D. R. Chakrabarty, et al.. (2005). Direct Observation of the4+-to-2+Gamma Transition inBe8. Physical Review Letters. 94(12). 122502–122502. 27 indexed citations
16.
Nayak, B. K., E. T. Mirgule, & R. K. Choudhury. (2005). Application of pulse shape discrimination in Si detector for fission fragment angular distribution measurements. Pramana. 65(6). 1053–1059. 4 indexed citations
17.
Chakrabarty, D. R., V. M. Datar, Suresh Kumar, et al.. (2003). Angular momentum gated giant dipole resonance measurements in the reaction28Si+58NiatE(28Si)=100and 125 MeV. Physical Review C. 67(2). 19 indexed citations
18.
Mitra, A., et al.. (2002). Broad structure in multiplicity gated proton spectra in 12C+93Nb reaction at E(12C)=42.5 MeV. Nuclear Physics A. 707(3-4). 343–353. 8 indexed citations
19.
Mirgule, E. T., M. Eswaran, Suresh Kumar, et al.. (1997). 6α-cluster resonance structures in12C+12C system and their decay inαand8Be channels. Physical Review C. 56(4). 1943–1953. 2 indexed citations
20.
Kumar, Suresh, M. Eswaran, E. T. Mirgule, et al.. (1994). Structural connection of highly deformed shape isomeric states inSi28,Mg24, andNe20by alpha-alpha coincidence studies inC12(16O,α)24Mg*→α+20Ne*. Physical Review C. 50(3). 1535–1542. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026