N. Deshmukh

865 total citations
25 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

N. Deshmukh is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Deshmukh has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 9 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in N. Deshmukh's work include Nuclear physics research studies (23 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (8 papers). N. Deshmukh is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (23 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (8 papers). N. Deshmukh collaborates with scholars based in India, Brazil and Italy. N. Deshmukh's co-authors include B. K. Nayak, J. Lubián, S. Mukherjee, R. K. Choudhury, S. Appannababu, P. K. Rath, S. Santra, N. L. Singh, D. C. Biswas and D. Patel and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Nuclear Physics A and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

In The Last Decade

N. Deshmukh

23 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N. Deshmukh India 11 264 118 80 24 24 25 268
E. N. Cardozo Brazil 9 260 1.0× 124 1.1× 81 1.0× 10 0.4× 17 0.7× 20 262
B. Paes Brazil 11 357 1.4× 183 1.6× 99 1.2× 23 1.0× 15 0.6× 27 359
E. de Barbará Argentina 12 374 1.4× 197 1.7× 98 1.2× 46 1.9× 15 0.6× 29 387
D. Martínez Heimann Argentina 9 359 1.4× 191 1.6× 80 1.0× 38 1.6× 9 0.4× 21 372
A. Esmaylzadeh Germany 9 157 0.6× 109 0.9× 85 1.1× 17 0.7× 30 1.3× 31 202
V. Scarduelli Brazil 12 350 1.3× 154 1.3× 142 1.8× 11 0.5× 18 0.8× 35 361
M. Rüdigier Germany 8 156 0.6× 86 0.7× 139 1.7× 24 1.0× 27 1.1× 20 224
S. Lakshmi United States 9 145 0.5× 104 0.9× 107 1.3× 9 0.4× 10 0.4× 13 218
J.-M. Régis Germany 7 122 0.5× 76 0.6× 111 1.4× 20 0.8× 25 1.0× 19 187
M. Trotta Italy 8 305 1.2× 143 1.2× 88 1.1× 23 1.0× 9 0.4× 12 314

Countries citing papers authored by N. Deshmukh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Deshmukh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Deshmukh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Deshmukh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Deshmukh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Deshmukh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Deshmukh. The network helps show where N. Deshmukh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Deshmukh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Deshmukh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Deshmukh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Deshmukh. N. Deshmukh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gupta, Yogesh Kumar, Basanta Joshi, K. Ramachandran, et al.. (2024). Observation of near-scission “polar” and “equatorial” proton emission in heavy-ion induced fission. Physics Letters B. 858. 139014–139014.
2.
Pal, A., T. Santhosh, V. V. Parkar, et al.. (2024). Fission modes in Ac223 and Pa227 compound nuclei. Physical review. C. 110(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Pal, A., S. Santra, P. C. Rout, et al.. (2024). Experimental evidence of shell effects in slow quasifission. Physical review. C. 110(3). 2 indexed citations
4.
Bhattacharjee, Saikat, M. K. Pradhan, N. Deshmukh, et al.. (2022). Systematic investigation of channel-coupling effects on elastic, inelastic, and neutron-transfer channels in Li6+Tb159. Physical review. C. 106(6).
5.
Gupta, Yogesh Kumar, B. V. John, Basanta Joshi, et al.. (2022). New signature of non-equilibrium fission from pre-scission α-particle emission. Physics Letters B. 834. 137452–137452. 2 indexed citations
6.
Ferreira, J. L., D. Carbone, M. Cavallaro, et al.. (2021). Analysis of two-proton transfer in the Ca40(O18,Ne20)Ar38 reaction at 270 MeV incident energy. Physical review. C. 103(5). 6 indexed citations
7.
Torresi, D., O. Sgouros, V. Soukeras, et al.. (2020). An upgraded focal plane detector for the MAGNEX spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 989. 164918–164918. 12 indexed citations
8.
Deshmukh, N., J. Lubián, & S. Mukherjee. (2019). Total reaction cross-section and reduction methodology for various projectiles on medium-mass 58Ni target. Europhysics Letters (EPL). 127(1). 12001–12001. 2 indexed citations
9.
Guimarães, V., E. N. Cardozo, V. Scarduelli, et al.. (2019). Strong coupling effect in the elastic scattering of the C10+Ni58 system near barrier. Physical review. C. 100(3). 10 indexed citations
10.
Deshmukh, N. & J. Lubián. (2018). Total reaction cross section for the 11B + 58Ni system and application of a recent new reduction methodology. The European Physical Journal A. 54(6). 3 indexed citations
11.
Scarduelli, V., D. Abriola, A. Arazi, et al.. (2017). Elastic and inelastic scattering for the 'ANTPOT. 10 'B' + 'ANTPOT. 58 'NI' system at near-barrier energies. Physical review. C. 96(5). 54610. 3 indexed citations
12.
Patel, D., S. Mukherjee, N. Deshmukh, et al.. (2017). Influence of breakup on elastic and α-production channels in the 6 Li+ 116 Sn reaction. Chinese Physics C. 41(10). 104001–104001. 1 indexed citations
13.
Lichtenthäler, R., M. A. G. Álvarez, A. Lépine‐Szily, et al.. (2016). RIBRAS: The Facility for Exotic Nuclei in Brazil. Few-Body Systems. 57(3). 157–163. 11 indexed citations
14.
Deshmukh, N., V. Guimarães, E. Crema, et al.. (2015). Elastic and inelastic scattering for theB11+Ni58system: Target and projectile reorientation effects. Physical Review C. 92(5). 18 indexed citations
15.
Mukherjee, S., D. C. Biswas, B. K. Nayak, et al.. (2014). Effect of breakup processes on the near-barrier elastic scattering of the6,7Li +232Th systems. Physical Review C. 89(1). 21 indexed citations
16.
Patel, D., B. K. Nayak, S. Mukherjee, et al.. (2013). Influence of breakup on fusion barrier distributions. AIP conference proceedings. 171–173. 3 indexed citations
17.
Biswas, D. C., Pratap Roy, Yogesh Kumar Gupta, et al.. (2012). Projectile structure effects in multi-nucleon and cluster transfers in16,18O+164Dy,208Pb reactions. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 381. 12091–12091. 5 indexed citations
18.
Deshmukh, N., S. Mukherjee, B. K. Nayak, et al.. (2012). Threshold anomaly in the elastic scattering of the weakly bound projectile 7Li on the medium-mass target 116Sn. AIP conference proceedings. 122–125. 2 indexed citations
19.
Appannababu, S., S. Mukherjee, B. K. Nayak, et al.. (2011). Fission fragment mass distributions in reactions forming theFr213compound nucleus. Physical Review C. 83(3). 11 indexed citations
20.
Mukherjee, S., N. Deshmukh, V. Guimarães, et al.. (2010). Total reaction cross-sections for light weakly bound systems. The European Physical Journal A. 45(1). 23–28. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026