Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Molecular-dynamics study of a three-dimensional one-component model for distortive phase transitions
19781.2k citationsT. Schneider, E. StollPhysical review. B, Condensed matterprofile →
Real-space observation of the reconstruction of Au(100)
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Stoll more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Stoll. The network helps show where E. Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Stoll
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Stoll.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Stoll based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Stoll. E. Stoll is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stoll, E., P. F. Meier, & T. A. Claxton. (2003). Charge Distribution in La2-xSrxCuO4. International Journal of Modern Physics B. 17(18n20). 3329–3338.3 indexed citations
Schneider, T. & E. Stoll. (1978). Molecular-dynamics study of a three-dimensional one-component model for distortive phase transitions. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 17(3). 1302–1322.1227 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Roncari, G., E. Stoll, & H. Zuber. (1976). [43] Thermophilic aminopeptidase I. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 45. 522–530.18 indexed citations
11.
Stoll, E., Pierre Meier, & T. Schneider. (1974). Metallic hydrogen. Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B. 23(1). 90–101.3 indexed citations
12.
Jost, R., et al.. (1974). Metabolic differences in Bacillus stearothermophilus grown at 55 degrees C and 37 degrees C.. PubMed. 95(2). 125–38.10 indexed citations
Rossi, Ettore, E. Stoll, & Saul Roseman. (1968). Biochemistry of glycoproteins and related substances. KARGER eBooks.54 indexed citations
18.
Klewe, Bernt, Erling Thom, E. Stoll, et al.. (1967). The Molecular Structure of Silicon Tetraisocyanate.. Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry. 21. 1381–1382.14 indexed citations
19.
Jerslev, Bodil, Erling Thom, E. Stoll, et al.. (1967). The Crystal and Molecular Structure of anti-Furfuraldoxime.. Acta chemica Scandinavica/Acta chemica Scandinavica. B, Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. A, Physical and inorganic chemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series B. Organic chemistry and biochemistry/Acta chemica Scandinavica. Series A, Physical and inorganic chemistry. 21. 730–736.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.