E. Schuberth

789 citations
41 papers · 594 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

E. Schuberth

39 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

E. Schuberth
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Condensed Matter Physics 406
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 229
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 247
  • Geophysics 66
  • Materials Chemistry 86
Replace W. Bieger with:
W. Bieger Germany
G. Solt Switzerland
Y. Mizuno Japan
D. Coffey United States
W. Nessler Germany
V. R. Shaginyan Russia
D. Ll. Williams Canada
V. V. Kabanov Belarus
Stephen Nettel United States
Masako Akai Japan
E. Schuberth relative to W. Bieger Germany W. Bieger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
W. Bieger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Schuberth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Schuberth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Schuberth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Schuberth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Schuberth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Schuberth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Schuberth. The network helps show where E. Schuberth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Schuberth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Schuberth Line = papers co-authored together E. Schuberth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198394
2 201671
3 199246
4 198835
5 200532
6 198728
7 197525
8 199922
9 200522
10 199519
11 199519
12 200618
13 197618
14 197815
15 198415
16 197912
17 199010
18 19869
19 19778
20 20047

About E. Schuberth

E. Schuberth is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Geophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (25 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (24 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (11 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (9 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (4 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (406 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (229 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (247 citations), Geophysics (66 citations) and Materials Chemistry (86 citations). E. Schuberth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include K. Andres, M. Creuzburg, G. Eska, G. Ebert, G. Weimann, K. von Klitzing, C. Probst, K. Ploog, F. Groß and F. Steglich. Their work appears in journals such as physica status solidi (b), Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physica B Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026