Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis
2010678 citationsNicole Simunovic, P.J. Devereaux et al.Canadian Medical Association Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Schemitsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Schemitsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Schemitsch more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Schemitsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Schemitsch. The network helps show where E. Schemitsch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Schemitsch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Schemitsch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Schemitsch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Schemitsch. E. Schemitsch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Simunovic, Nicole, P.J. Devereaux, Sheila Sprague, et al.. (2010). Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 182(15). 1609–1616.678 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Waddell, J.P., et al.. (2010). HP14: PROXIMITY OF THE FEMORAL NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE DURING HIP RESURFACING. 184–184.2 indexed citations
Bederman, S. Samuel, Mac McKee, E. Schemitsch, & Mohit Bhandari. (2009). DO CORTICOSTEROIDS REDUCE THE RISK OF FAT EMBOLISM SYNDROME IN POLY-TRAUMA PATIENTS?: A META-ANALYSIS. 254–254.1 indexed citations
8.
Schemitsch, E., et al.. (2009). PREDICTORS OF FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE FOLLOWING HIP RESURFACING: A CADAVERIC STUDY. 146–146.1 indexed citations
9.
Haydon, C., et al.. (2008). A COMPARISON OF THE OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH ISOLATED PULMONARY CONTUSIONS VERSUS THOSE WITH PULMONARY CONTUSIONS AND FEMORAL SHAFT FRACTURES. 253–253.1 indexed citations
10.
Schemitsch, E., et al.. (2008). BONE TRANSPORT USING THE “MONORAIL” TECHNIQUE: PATIENT OUTCOME AND COMPLICATIONS.. 47–47.1 indexed citations
11.
Ferguson, Peter C., et al.. (2008). A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THE RESTORATION AND THE HMRS DISTAL FEMORAL PRESS-FIT STEMS. 132–133.1 indexed citations
Byrick, Robert J., et al.. (2002). LETTERS TO THE EDITOR. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 16(3). 211–212.1 indexed citations
14.
Beimers, Lijkele, et al.. (2002). Subcapital hip fractures: the Garden classification should be replaced, not collapsed.. PubMed. 45(6). 411–4.33 indexed citations
15.
Schemitsch, E., et al.. (1999). Ogilvie's syndrome after lower extremity arthroplasty.. PubMed. 42(2). 133–7.17 indexed citations
Waddell, J.P., et al.. (1991). Madreporic-surfaced femoral arthroplasties in the dog. Histomorphometric analysis in relation to micromotion. View.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.