E. Romera

2.2k citations
84 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

E. Romera

84 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

E. Romera
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 827
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
  • Artificial Intelligence 428
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 68
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 98
Replace J. C. Angulo with:
J. C. Angulo Spain
Robin P. Sagar Mexico
J. Antolín Spain
Heide Narnhofer Austria
S. López‐Rosa Spain
K. D. Sen India
L. M. Nieto Spain
Elmer L. Offenbacher United States
Jan Naudts Belgium
Georges Jolicard France
E. Romera relative to J. C. Angulo Spain J. C. Angulo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
J. C. Angulo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Romera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Romera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Romera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Romera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Romera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Romera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Romera. The network helps show where E. Romera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Romera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Romera Line = papers co-authored together E. Romera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004209
2 2005143
3 200668
4 200760
5 201458
6 200954
7 200948
8 199448
9 200845
10 201543
11 200841
12 201240
13 200933
14 200830
15 201530
16 200829
17 201429
18 200229
19 201129
20 199828

About E. Romera

E. Romera is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Artificial Intelligence, Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (23 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (20 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (16 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (15 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (14 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (14 papers) and Graphene research and applications (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (827 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations), Artificial Intelligence (428 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (68 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (98 citations). E. Romera has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Hungary and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include J. S. Dehesa, Á. Nagy, Manuel Calixto, P. Sánchez‐Moreno, F. de los Santos, J. C. Angulo, Toshikatsu Koga, Octavio Castaños, Hisashi Matsuyama and J.B. Roldán. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Physics Letters A, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications and Europhysics Letters (EPL).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact