Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Optimization of the simultaneous localization and map-building algorithm for real-time implementation
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Nebot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Nebot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Nebot more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Nebot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Nebot. The network helps show where E. Nebot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Nebot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Nebot.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Nebot based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Nebot. E. Nebot is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ferrari, A., Anton Lechner, M.J. Barnes, et al.. (2012). UFOs IN THE LHC: OBSERVATIONS, STUDIES AND EXTRAPOLATIONS. Presented at. 3936–3938.7 indexed citations
10.
Bracco, Chiara, R. Schmidt, Annika Nordt, et al.. (2012). EXPERIMENTS ON THE MARGIN OF BEAM INDUCED QUENCHES FOR A SUPERCONDUCTING QUADRUPOLE MAGNET IN THE LHC. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
11.
Redaelli, Stefano, Daniel Wollmann, Mariusz Sapinski, et al.. (2012). Pb ions collimator losses in IR7 DS and quench test at 3.5 Z TeV. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
12.
Nebot, E., et al.. (2012). STUDY OF THE RESPONSE OF LOW PRESSURE IONIZATION CHAMBERS.2 indexed citations
13.
Yang, Z., Annika Nordt, R. Schmidt, et al.. (2011). ANALYSIS OF FAST LOSSES IN THE LHC WITH THE BLM SYSTEM. Presented at. 1344–1346.8 indexed citations
14.
Nebot, E., Annika Nordt, Mariusz Sapinski, et al.. (2011). HANDLING OF BLM ABORT THRESHOLDS IN THE LHC. Presented at. 2382–2384.3 indexed citations
15.
Nieto, Juan, et al.. (2009). Large scale visual odometry using stereo vision. DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)). 1–7.4 indexed citations
16.
Nebot, E., et al.. (2007). Main Research Issues for the Deployment of Full Autonomous Surface Mining Operations.. Computers and Their Applications. 213–218.2 indexed citations
17.
Bailey, Tim, Juan Nieto, José Guivant, Michael Stevens, & E. Nebot. (2006). Consistency of the EKF-SLAM Algorithm. 3562–3568.387 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Masson, Favio R., José Guivant, Juan Nieto, & E. Nebot. (2005). The hybrid metric map: a solution for precision farming. Latin American Applied Research - An international journal. 35(2). 105–110.6 indexed citations
19.
Bozorg, Mohammad & E. Nebot. (1995). Zero Location of Linear Systems Under Parameter Uncertainties. 313.2 indexed citations
20.
Nebot, E., et al.. (1994). Use of Quadtree Representation and Ultrasonic Sensors for Mapping a Mobile Robot's Environment. International Symposium on Information Theory and its Applications. 709.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.