E. L. Smith

985 total citations
19 papers, 758 citations indexed

About

E. L. Smith is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, E. L. Smith has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 758 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ophthalmology, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in E. L. Smith's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers). E. L. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers). E. L. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. E. L. Smith's co-authors include Li‐Fang Hung, Josh Wallman, Ronald S. Harwerth, Donald A. Witzel, Louis DeSantis, Donald A. Fox, Geoffrey K. Aguirre, Yuzo M. Chino, Vijay S. Dayal and Chea‐su Kee and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Vision Research and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

E. L. Smith

19 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E. L. Smith United States	13	451	392	360	219	154	19	758
Joseph Turkel United States	7	273 0.6×	271 0.7×	255 0.7×	234 1.1×	139 0.9×	7	676
Marcus H. C. Howlett Netherlands	12	467 1.0×	444 1.1×	482 1.3×	142 0.6×	256 1.7×	18	879
Michael D. Gottlieb United States	7	739 1.6×	841 2.1×	782 2.2×	170 0.8×	309 2.0×	11	1.3k
Oren Yehezkel Israel	16	328 0.7×	186 0.5×	159 0.4×	425 1.9×	45 0.3×	49	657
Hua Bi United States	15	320 0.7×	171 0.4×	190 0.5×	318 1.5×	137 0.9×	48	666
Jody A. Summers United States	9	502 1.1×	507 1.3×	532 1.5×	72 0.3×	166 1.1×	18	881
Emma L. Markwell Australia	8	377 0.8×	370 0.9×	444 1.2×	96 0.4×	105 0.7×	10	735
Gordon G. Heath United States	11	237 0.5×	187 0.5×	134 0.4×	409 1.9×	94 0.6×	23	672
Florence Rigaudière France	11	126 0.3×	243 0.6×	164 0.5×	106 0.5×	181 1.2×	38	471
Hadi Ostadi Moghaddam Iran	8	329 0.7×	328 0.8×	316 0.9×	81 0.4×	108 0.7×	15	521

Countries citing papers authored by E. L. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. L. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. L. Smith. The network helps show where E. L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. L. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. L. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. L. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. L. Smith. E. L. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

She, Zhihui, et al.. (2024). Optic Nerve Head Morphology and Macula Ganglion Cell Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness in Axially Anisometropic Rhesus Monkeys. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 65(10). 44–44. 1 indexed citations

Tao, Xiaofeng, Bin Zhang, E. L. Smith, et al.. (2011). Local sensitivity to stimulus orientation and spatial frequency within the receptive fields of neurons in visual area 2 of macaque monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology. 107(4). 1094–1110. 17 indexed citations

Nakatsuka, C., Ichiro Watanabe, Hua Bi, et al.. (2007). Effects of Perceptual Learning on Local Stereopsis and Neuronal Responses of V1 and V2 in Prism-Reared Monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology. 97(4). 2612–2626. 20 indexed citations

Bi, Hua, Ichiro Maruko, Ichiro Watanabe, et al.. (2007). Development of Temporal Response Properties and Contrast Sensitivity of V1 and V2 Neurons in Macaque Monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology. 97(6). 3905–3916. 40 indexed citations

Ramamirtham, Ramkumar, Chea‐su Kee, Ying Qiao-Grider, et al.. (2005). Corneal and Internal Wave Aberrations in Normal Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca Mulatta). 46(13). 1972–1972. 2 indexed citations

Kee, Chea‐su, Ramkumar Ramamirtham, Ying Qiao-Grider, et al.. (2004). The Role of Peripheral Vision in the Refractive–Error Development of Infant Monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1157–1157. 3 indexed citations

Kee, Chea‐su, et al.. (2002). Prevalence of astigmatism in infant monkeys. Vision Research. 42(11). 1349–1359. 34 indexed citations

Smith, E. L., et al.. (2002). Continuous ambient lighting and eye growth in primates.. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 133(1). 176–177. 27 indexed citations

Smith, E. L. & Li‐Fang Hung. (2000). Form-deprivation myopia in monkeys is a graded phenomenon. Vision Research. 40(4). 371–381. 118 indexed citations

10.

Smith, E. L., Li‐Fang Hung, & Ronald S. Harwerth. (2000). The degree of image degradation and the depth of amblyopia.. PubMed. 41(12). 3775–81. 15 indexed citations

11.

Hung, Li‐Fang, Josh Wallman, & E. L. Smith. (2000). Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys.. PubMed. 41(6). 1259–69. 214 indexed citations

12.

Harwerth, Ronald S., E. L. Smith, & Louis DeSantis. (1997). Experimental glaucoma: perimetric field defects and intraocular pressure.. PubMed. 6(6). 390–401. 43 indexed citations

13.

Smith, E. L., et al.. (1994). Effects of optically induced blur on the refractive status of young monkeys. Vision Research. 34(3). 293–301. 99 indexed citations

14.

Smith, E. L., et al.. (1991). Refractive-error changes in kitten eyes produced by chronic on-channel blockade. Vision Research. 31(5). 833–844. 38 indexed citations

15.

Witzel, Donald A., et al.. (1978). Congenital stationary night blindness: an animal model.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 17(8). 788–95. 49 indexed citations

16.

Witzel, Donald A., et al.. (1976). Arsanilic Acid-Induced Blindness in Swine: Electroretinographic and Visually Evoked Responses. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 37(5). 521–524. 10 indexed citations

17.

Witzel, Donald A., John H. Johnson, Donald G. Pitts, & E. L. Smith. (1976). Scleral Contact Lens Electrodes for Electroretinography in Domesticated Animals. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 37(8). 983–986. 2 indexed citations

18.

Dayal, Vijay S., et al.. (1975). Gentamicin - Progressive cochlear toxicity.. PubMed. 4(2). 348–51. 6 indexed citations

19.

Dayal, Vijay S., et al.. (1974). Cochlear and Vestibular Gentamicin Toxicity: A Clinical Study of Systemic and Topical Usage. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 100(5). 338–340. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact