E. L. Proebsting

1.6k total citations
77 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

E. L. Proebsting is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, E. L. Proebsting has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 72 papers in Plant Science, 11 papers in Soil Science and 5 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in E. L. Proebsting's work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (64 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (46 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (31 papers). E. L. Proebsting is often cited by papers focused on Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (64 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (46 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (31 papers). E. L. Proebsting collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. E. L. Proebsting's co-authors include Dennis C. Gross, Robert C. Ebel, Robert G. Evans, Preston K. Andrews, M. E. Patterson, Kim Patten, Robert A. Spotts, S. R. Drake, B. Bravdo and Sorkel Kadir and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Journal of Food Science.

In The Last Decade

E. L. Proebsting

75 papers receiving 978 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. L. Proebsting United States 20 1.0k 222 188 155 85 77 1.2k
J. G. Buwalda New Zealand 18 920 0.9× 172 0.8× 178 0.9× 76 0.5× 62 0.7× 53 997
William A. Brun United States 25 1.7k 1.7× 133 0.6× 191 1.0× 267 1.7× 26 0.3× 51 1.9k
P. H. Jerie Australia 20 913 0.9× 499 2.2× 345 1.8× 108 0.7× 27 0.3× 54 1.1k
J. Tromp Netherlands 23 1.0k 1.0× 78 0.4× 91 0.5× 441 2.8× 71 0.8× 58 1.2k
James A. Flore United States 18 719 0.7× 81 0.4× 230 1.2× 115 0.7× 19 0.2× 37 805
D. R. Tottman Italy 7 891 0.9× 109 0.5× 38 0.2× 103 0.7× 64 0.8× 10 1.0k
Atilio J. Barneix Argentina 23 1.3k 1.3× 190 0.9× 80 0.4× 253 1.6× 17 0.2× 49 1.5k
K.R. Day United States 13 564 0.5× 119 0.5× 201 1.1× 86 0.6× 33 0.4× 26 631
Ian F. Wardlaw Australia 12 1.3k 1.3× 124 0.6× 304 1.6× 199 1.3× 23 0.3× 14 1.5k
Desmond R. Layne United States 19 898 0.9× 54 0.2× 164 0.9× 205 1.3× 62 0.7× 45 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by E. L. Proebsting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. L. Proebsting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. L. Proebsting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. L. Proebsting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. L. Proebsting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. L. Proebsting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. L. Proebsting. The network helps show where E. L. Proebsting may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. L. Proebsting

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. L. Proebsting. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. L. Proebsting based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. L. Proebsting. E. L. Proebsting is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1992). Freezing Behavior of Prunus, Subgenus Padus, Flower Buds. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 117(6). 955–960. 18 indexed citations
2.
Proebsting, E. L.. (1990). The interaction between fruit size and yield in sweet cherry.. Fruit varieties journal. 44(3). 169–172. 19 indexed citations
3.
Andrews, Preston K., E. L. Proebsting, & Dennis C. Gross. (1983). Differential thermal analysis and freezing injury of deacclimating peach and sweet cherry reproductive organs [Cold hardiness, Prunus avium, Prunus persica, Pseudomonas syringae].. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 18 indexed citations
4.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1981). Influence of trickle and sprinkle irrigation on 'Golden Delicious' apple quality [Leaf water potential, quality of apple products]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 8 indexed citations
5.
Drake, S. R., et al.. (1980). Effects of Daminozide, Maturity, and Cultivar on the Color Grade and Character of Sweet Cherries1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 105(5). 668–670. 1 indexed citations
6.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1980). The Behavior of Peach and Pear Trees under Extreme Drought Stress1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 105(3). 380–385. 34 indexed citations
7.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1980). Seasonal Changes in Low Temperature Resistance of Grape Buds. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 31(4). 329–336. 28 indexed citations
8.
Drake, S. R., et al.. (1978). Effect of Growth Regulators on Ascorbic Acid Content, Drained Weight and Color of Fresh and Processed ‘Rainer’ Cherries1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 103(2). 162–164. 6 indexed citations
9.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1978). Low Temperature Resistance of Developing Flower Buds of Six Deciduous Fruit Species1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 103(2). 192–198. 72 indexed citations
10.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1978). A Synoptic Analysis of Peach and Cherry Flower Bud Hardiness1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 103(6). 842–845. 15 indexed citations
11.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1974). Time of Gibberellin Application Determines Hardiness Response of ‘Bing’ Cherry Buds and Wood1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 99(5). 464–466. 5 indexed citations
12.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1972). A Comparison of Hardiness Responses in Fruit Buds of ‘Bing’ Cherry and ‘Elberta’ Peach1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 97(6). 802–806. 19 indexed citations
13.
Proebsting, E. L.. (1970). Relation of Fall and Winter Temperatures to Flower Bud Behavior and Wood Hardiness of Deciduous Fruit Trees. HortScience. 5(5). 422–424. 12 indexed citations
14.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1969). Effects of Growth Regulators on Fruit Bud Hardiness in Prunus1. HortScience. 4(3). 254–255. 8 indexed citations
15.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1963). Cover crops improve infiltration rates spray noncultivation and sawdust mulches ineffective in orchard trials. California Agriculture. 17(5). 4–5. 1 indexed citations
16.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1962). Nitrogen and crop level effects on: Canned freestone peach quality. California Agriculture. 16(1). 7–7. 2 indexed citations
17.
Proebsting, E. L.. (1961). Response of Bartlett pear to nitrogen in California. California Agriculture. 15(6). 14–15. 1 indexed citations
18.
Proebsting, E. L.. (1960). Leaf analysis and fertilizer response. California Agriculture. 14(6). 10–10. 1 indexed citations
19.
Proebsting, E. L., et al.. (1958). Boron requirements of prunes: Diagnostic and treatment experiments in Sonoma County show promise in control of brushy branch disease of prune trees. California Agriculture. 12(8). 8–13. 1 indexed citations
20.
Proebsting, E. L.. (1951). Nitrogen sprays: Tests reported with fertilizer containing 44% organic nitrogen. California Agriculture. 5(3). 12–12. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026