E. Knapp

412 citations
15 papers · 302 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Plant Virus Research Studies 12
    • Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms 2
    • Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 2
    • Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 2
    • Plant tissue culture and regeneration 5
    • Plant Reproductive Biology 3

E. Knapp

15 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

E. Knapp
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Endocrinology 55
  • Biotechnology 65
  • Plant Science 228
  • Horticulture 3
  • Molecular Biology 169
Replace Eiko Nakazono‐Nagaoka with:
Eiko Nakazono‐Nagaoka Japan
Rick Sanders United States
Luisa López-Ochoa Mexico
O. Shoseyov Israel
John F. C. Steele United Kingdom
Marion E. Pucher Austria
Xiao‐Xia Shangguan China
Huifeng Ke China
Frederique F. van Gijsegem France
Bill Hendrix United States
E. Knapp relative to Eiko Nakazono‐Nagaoka Japan Eiko Nakazono‐Nagaoka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eiko Nakazono‐Nagaoka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Knapp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Knapp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Knapp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Knapp. The network helps show where E. Knapp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Knapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Knapp Line = papers co-authored together E. Knapp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 199290
2 199539
3 200833
4 199531
5 200125
6 200522
7 201221
8 200117
9 20077
10 19987
11 19956
12 19951
13 19941
14 20131
15 19921

About E. Knapp

E. Knapp is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Ecology and Cell Biology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Virus Research Studies (12 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (5 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (3 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (2 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (2 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (55 citations), Biotechnology (65 citations), Plant Science (228 citations), Horticulture (3 citations) and Molecular Biology (169 citations). E. Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Dennis J. Lewandowski, Margit Laimer, Artur da Câmara Machado, V. Hanzer, H. Katinger, B. Weiß, Diann Achor, Diethard Mattanovich, Hermann Katinger and William O. Dawson. Their work appears in journals such as Virology, Plant Cell Reports, Molecular Plant Pathology, BioTechniques and Viruses.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact