E. H. Mercer

6.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
84 papers, 4.8k citations indexed

About

E. H. Mercer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, E. H. Mercer has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 4.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Molecular Biology, 17 papers in Cell Biology and 14 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in E. H. Mercer's work include Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (14 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (11 papers) and Silk-based biomaterials and applications (7 papers). E. H. Mercer is often cited by papers focused on Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (14 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (11 papers) and Silk-based biomaterials and applications (7 papers). E. H. Mercer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. E. H. Mercer's co-authors include M. S. C. Birbeck, David J. Anderson, David J. Gerber, Eric R. Kandel, Dong Feng Chen, Susumu Tonegawa, Mark Mayford, Cindy W. Tom, Joe Z. Tsien and Amita Sehgal and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

E. H. Mercer

82 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Hit Papers

Subregion- and Cell Type–Restricted Gene Knockout in Mous... 1986 2026 1999 2012 1996 1986 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
E. H. Mercer United Kingdom 32 2.0k 1.4k 815 652 359 84 4.8k
Marcus Singer United States 35 2.3k 1.1× 1.9k 1.4× 869 1.1× 363 0.6× 923 2.6× 110 4.7k
J. A. Kiernan Canada 36 1.3k 0.7× 1.2k 0.9× 284 0.3× 230 0.4× 479 1.3× 149 5.4k
K. C. Richardson United States 18 1.5k 0.7× 999 0.7× 549 0.7× 424 0.7× 138 0.4× 39 4.7k
Bryce L. Munger United States 40 1.2k 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 796 1.0× 449 0.7× 132 0.4× 91 4.6k
Norman K. Wessells United States 43 4.2k 2.1× 1.9k 1.3× 2.8k 3.5× 1.0k 1.6× 582 1.6× 72 8.7k
W. Bargmann Germany 34 1.3k 0.6× 927 0.7× 866 1.1× 282 0.4× 170 0.5× 88 4.8k
Axel Visel United States 47 7.1k 3.5× 514 0.4× 600 0.7× 2.0k 3.0× 410 1.1× 107 9.6k
John A. Mercer United States 33 2.3k 1.2× 746 0.5× 1.5k 1.8× 301 0.5× 102 0.3× 76 4.5k
John F. Hartmann United States 32 1.2k 0.6× 782 0.6× 431 0.5× 257 0.4× 145 0.4× 105 4.2k
C. P. Leblond Canada 52 4.0k 2.0× 1.3k 0.9× 1.3k 1.6× 1.5k 2.3× 1.5k 4.2× 86 10.5k

Countries citing papers authored by E. H. Mercer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. H. Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. H. Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. H. Mercer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. H. Mercer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. H. Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. H. Mercer. The network helps show where E. H. Mercer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. H. Mercer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. H. Mercer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. H. Mercer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. H. Mercer. E. H. Mercer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zinyk, Dawn, E. H. Mercer, Esther Harris, David J. Anderson, & Alexandra L. Joyner. (1998). Fate mapping of the mouse midbrain–hindbrain constriction using a site-specific recombination system. Current Biology. 8(11). 665–672. 169 indexed citations
2.
Tsien, Joe Z., Dong Feng Chen, David J. Gerber, et al.. (1996). Subregion- and Cell Type–Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain. Cell. 87(7). 1317–1326. 992 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Hoyle, Gary W., E. H. Mercer, Richard D. Palmiter, & Ralph L. Brinster. (1993). Expression of NGF in sympathetic neurons leads to excessive axon outgrowth from ganglia but decreased terminal innervation within tissues. Neuron. 10(6). 1019–1034. 89 indexed citations
4.
Mercer, E. H., Gary W. Hoyle, Raj P. Kapur, Ralph L. Brinster, & Richard D. Palmiter. (1991). The dopamine β-hydroxylase gene promoter directs expression of E. coli lacZ to sympathetic and other neurons in adult transgenic mice. Neuron. 7(5). 703–716. 239 indexed citations
5.
Kapur, Raj P., Gary W. Hoyle, E. H. Mercer, Ralph L. Brinster, & R D Palmiter. (1991). Some neuronal cell populations express human dopamine β-hydroxylase-lacZ transgenes transiently during embryonic development. Neuron. 7(5). 717–727. 68 indexed citations
6.
Filshie, B.K., M. F. Day, & E. H. Mercer. (1975). Colour and colour change in the grasshopper, Kosciuscola tristis. Journal of Insect Physiology. 21(11). 1763–1770. 19 indexed citations
7.
Doy, Colin H., et al.. (1967). Ultrastructure of the Obligate Halophilic Bacterium Halobacterium halobium. Journal of Bacteriology. 94(1). 196–201. 24 indexed citations
8.
Cunningham, Alastair J., J. Bryan Smith, & E. H. Mercer. (1966). ANTIBODY FORMATION BY SINGLE CELLS FROM LYMPH NODES AND EFFERENT LYMPH OF SHEEP. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 124(4). 701–714. 106 indexed citations
9.
Nicholas, W. L. & E. H. Mercer. (1965). The ultrastructure of the tegument of Moniliformis dubius (Acanthocephala).. PubMed. 106(2). 137–46. 31 indexed citations
10.
Lapis, K. & E. H. Mercer. (1963). An Electron Microscope Study of NK Lymphoma Cells and the Changes Produced by Two Cytostatic Drugs. Cancer Research. 23(5). 676–681. 5 indexed citations
11.
Wolpert, Lewis & E. H. Mercer. (1963). An electron microscope study of the development of the blastula of the sea urchin embryo and its radial polarity. Experimental Cell Research. 30(2). 280–300. 86 indexed citations
12.
Mercer, E. H.. (1961). Electron Microscopy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. 54(12). 1057–1064. 13 indexed citations
13.
Mercer, E. H.. (1959). An electron microscopic study of Amoeba proteus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. 150(939). 216–232. 72 indexed citations
14.
Mercer, E. H. & P Brunet. (1959). The Electron Microscopy of the Left Colleterial Gland of the Cockroach. The Journal of Cell Biology. 5(2). 257–262. 77 indexed citations
15.
Mercer, E. H.. (1958). A modification to the Cambridge rocking microtome to facilitate the cutting of thin sections for electron microscopy. Journal of Scientific Instruments. 35(11). 426–427. 1 indexed citations
16.
Mercer, E. H.. (1954). The Action on Wool Fibers of Strong Solutions of Urea Containing Reducing Agents. Textile Research Journal. 24(9). 835–841. 6 indexed citations
17.
Mercer, E. H.. (1954). The Action of Carroting Agents. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions. 45(9). T719–T722. 3 indexed citations
18.
Phillips, D. M. P. & E. H. Mercer. (1953). Fibrous insulin (F-insulin). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 12(1-2). 592–593. 6 indexed citations
19.
Mercer, E. H.. (1952). The Biosynthesis of Fibers. 75. 280. 3 indexed citations
20.
Mercer, E. H. & Bertil Olofsson. (1951). Sedimentation and diffusion studies on a derivative of wool keratin. Journal of Polymer Science. 6(6). 671–680. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026