Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Accretion and the Evolution of T Tauri Disks
1998944 citationsLee Hartmann, Nuria Calvet et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Disk Accretion Rates for T Tauri Stars
1998579 citationsE. Gullbring, Lee Hartmann et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Gullbring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Gullbring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Gullbring more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Gullbring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Gullbring. The network helps show where E. Gullbring may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Gullbring
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Gullbring.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Gullbring based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Gullbring. E. Gullbring is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hartmann, Lee, Nuria Calvet, E. Gullbring, & Paola D’Alessio. (1998). Accretion and the Evolution of T Tauri Disks. The Astrophysical Journal. 495(1). 385–400.944 indexed citations breakdown →
Gullbring, E., Lee Hartmann, César Briceño, & Nuria Calvet. (1998). Disk Accretion Rates for T Tauri Stars. The Astrophysical Journal. 492(1). 323–341.579 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Liseau, R., et al.. (1998). The physical structure of the Herbig Haro object HH 29. 330(1). 327–335.
7.
Gullbring, E., H. Barwig, & J. H. M. M. Schmitt. (1997). Simultaneous optical and ROSAT X-ray observations of the classical T Tauri star BP Tauri.. 324(1). 155–160.2 indexed citations
8.
Gullbring, E. & G. F. Gahm. (1996). Simultaneous multicolour photometric and polarimetric observations of four T Tauri stars.. 308(3). 821–827.1 indexed citations
9.
Петров, П. П., E. Gullbring, I. Ilyin, et al.. (1996). The gas flows of SU Aurigae.. 314(3). 821–834.3 indexed citations
10.
Gullbring, E., et al.. (1996). Activity on the classical T Tauri star BP Tauri. 307(3). 791–802.1 indexed citations
11.
Gullbring, E., et al.. (1996). LINE PROFILE VARIATIONS OF THE CLASSICAL T TAURI STAR BP TAURI. 314(3). 835–845.4 indexed citations
12.
Gahm, G. F., et al.. (1995). Activity on young stars.. 301. 89.1 indexed citations
13.
Gahm, G. F., et al.. (1993). A decade of photometric observations of young stars, with special comments on periodicities. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 100(2). 371–393.3 indexed citations
14.
Gahm, G. F., et al.. (1993). The circumstellar gleam from the T Tauri star RY Lupi. 279(2). 477–484.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.