E. Gažo

3.2k citations
16 papers · 190 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

E. Gažo

16 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

E. Gažo
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Condensed Matter Physics 68
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 149
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 39
  • Geophysics 17
  • Aerospace Engineering 16
Replace R. E. Sager with:
R. E. Sager United States
E. Gažo Slovakia
M. Haug Germany
N.A. Chernoplekov Russia
Stephen C. Steel Netherlands
Kaiwen Zheng United States
J. M. Parpia United States
Y. Ohtani Japan
V. V. Chistyakov Russia
W. Leonhardt United States
E. Gažo relative to R. E. Sager United States R. E. Sager's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
R. E. Sager · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Gažo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Gažo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Gažo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Gažo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Gažo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Gažo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Gažo. The network helps show where E. Gažo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Gažo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Gažo Line = papers co-authored together E. Gažo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 200755
2 200751
3 200820
4 200816
5 200811
6 20197
7 20035
8 20095
9 20104
10 20094
11 20123
12 20083
13 20022
14 20162
15 20081
16 20141

About E. Gažo

E. Gažo is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Geophysics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (9 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (7 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (4 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (68 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (149 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (39 citations), Geophysics (17 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (16 citations). E. Gažo has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Czechia and Poland. Frequent co-authors include P. Skyba, Michaela Blažková, L. Skrbek, M. Reiffers, T. Toliński, A. Kowałczyk, D. Schmoranzer, D. I. Bradley, G. Chełkowska and V. B. Eltsov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Solid State Sciences and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact