E. Franklin Frazier
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Health
- Co-authors
- Leon F. LitwackC. Eric LincolnRobert J. CottrolVera RubinRudolph E. MorrisJoseph R. WashingtonJoseph S. RoučekMilton M. Gordon
- Topics
- Race, History, and American Society (3 papers)Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers)African history and culture studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
E. Franklin Frazier
24 papers receiving 253 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Sociology and Political Science 221
- Political Science and International Relations 46
- Anthropology 40
- Cultural Studies 39
- Health 34
Countries citing papers authored by E. Franklin Frazier
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Franklin Frazier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Franklin Frazier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Franklin Frazier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Franklin Frazier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Franklin Frazier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Franklin Frazier. The network helps show where E. Franklin Frazier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Franklin Frazier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Franklin Frazier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Franklin Frazier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Franklin Frazier. E. Franklin Frazier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Book review: the greens in British politics: protest, anti-austerity and the divided left by James Dennison | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Negro Church in America/The Black Church Since Frazier | 20 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | On race relations | 8 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 73 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | Race and culture contacts in the modern world | 35 |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About E. Franklin Frazier
E. Franklin Frazier is a scholar working on General Psychology, Anthropology and Cultural Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (2 papers) and African history and culture studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (221 citations), Cultural Studies (39 citations) and Anthropology (40 citations). E. Franklin Frazier has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Leon F. Litwack, C. Eric Lincoln, Robert J. Cottrol, Vera Rubin, Rudolph E. Morris, Joseph R. Washington, Joseph S. Rouček, Milton M. Gordon, Joseph S. Himes and John Hope Franklin. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.