E Felder

612 citations
33 papers · 328 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

E Felder

28 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

E Felder
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 103
  • Hepatology 23
  • Materials Chemistry 140
  • Spectroscopy 39
  • Filtration and Separation 4
Replace Dilip Worah with:
Dilip Worah United States
M W Sundberg United States
K. R. Metz United States
R. C. Long United States
Toshiro Yamaguchi Japan
Steinar Uran Norway
Elvedin Luković United States
I. Kofi Adzamli United States
Hanan Elajaili United States
F. Maton Belgium
E Felder relative to Dilip Worah United States Dilip Worah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Dilip Worah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E Felder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E Felder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E Felder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E Felder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E Felder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E Felder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E Felder. The network helps show where E Felder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside E Felder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E Felder Line = papers co-authored together E Felder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199051
2 198034
3 199032
4 199131
5 198831
6 197321
7 196018
8
Radiopaque contrast media. XLIV - Preclinical studies with a new nonionic contrast agent.
197713
9 198411
10 196710
11
Iopamidol: new preclinical and clinical data.
19818
12 19807
13 19886
14 19696
15 19886
16 19735
17 19635
18 19725
19 19845
20 19644

About E Felder

E Felder is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 33 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (9 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (3 papers) and Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (103 citations), Hepatology (23 citations), Materials Chemistry (140 citations), Spectroscopy (39 citations) and Filtration and Separation (4 citations). E Felder has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include D Pitrè, Piero Tirone, Giorgio Vittadini, Vito Lorusso, E. Tettamanti, Friedrich Cavagna, Roberto Passariello, Massimo Daprà, Christoph de Haën and Piero Pavone. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Radiology, Helvetica Chimica Acta, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A and Solid-State Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact