Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.
19862.9k citationsDenis Le Bihan, Élodie Breton et al.Radiologyprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Cabanis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Cabanis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Cabanis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Cabanis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Cabanis. The network helps show where E. Cabanis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Cabanis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Cabanis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Cabanis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Cabanis. E. Cabanis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Iba-Zizen, M T, et al.. (2010). Biometric's of gray encephalic nuclei, in MRI, 30 Boxers and 29 children.. 28. 49–57.1 indexed citations
2.
Iba-Zizen, M T, et al.. (2008). [The results of MRI exploration of glaucoma patients: what are the benefits?].. PubMed. 31(6 Pt 2). 2S24–8.4 indexed citations
Cabanis, E., et al.. (1988). Stereotactic biopsy of the brain with the Leksell frame in the context of modern radiology.. PubMed. 15(1). 63–75.2 indexed citations
Bihan, Denis Le, Élodie Breton, D Lallemand, et al.. (1986). MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.. Radiology. 161(2). 401–407.2912 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Raynaud, C., G Rancurel, Yves Samson, et al.. (1984). Measurement of oxygen metabolism, 123-I-IMP distribution and rCBF-Xe in patients with ischemic vascular disease. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).3 indexed citations
18.
Rougemont, D, Jean‐Claude Baron, P Lebrun-Grandié, et al.. (1983). DEBIT SANGUIN CEREBRAL ET EXTRACTION D'OXYGENE DANS LES HEMIPLEGIES LACUNAIRES: ETUDE SEMI-QUANTITATIVE PAR L'OXYGENE 15 ET LA TOMOGRAPHIE D'EMISSION. Revue Neurologique. 139(4).5 indexed citations
19.
Rougemont, D, Jean‐Claude Baron, P Lebrun-Grandié, et al.. (1983). [Cerebral blood flow and oxygen extraction in lacunar hemiplegia. Semi-quantitative study using oxygen 15 and emission tomography].. PubMed. 139(4). 277–82.8 indexed citations
20.
Baron, Jean‐Claude, J. Y. Delattre, J Bories, et al.. (1983). Comparison study of CT and positron emission tomographic data in recent cerebral infarction.. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 4(3). 536–40.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.