Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Local Metamaterial-Based Waveguides in Gaps Between Parallel Metal Plates
2009671 citationsPer-Simon Kildal, E. Alfonso et al.IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Lettersprofile →
Design and experimental verification of ridge gap waveguide in bed of nails for parallel-plate mode suppression
2011333 citationsAshraf Uz Zaman, Eva Rajo‐Iglesias et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Alfonso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Alfonso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Alfonso more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Alfonso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Alfonso. The network helps show where E. Alfonso may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Alfonso
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Alfonso.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Alfonso based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Alfonso. E. Alfonso is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alfonso, E., et al.. (2015). Analysis of large planar 60 GHz array including microstrip-ridge gap waveguide distribution network using modular approach. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation. 1–4.1 indexed citations
7.
Alfonso, E. & Per-Simon Kildal. (2013). Parabolic cylindrical reflector antenna at 60 GHz with line feed in gap waveguide technology. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 319–323.8 indexed citations
8.
Alfonso, E., Ashraf Uz Zaman, Elena Pucci, & Per-Simon Kildal. (2012). Gap waveguide components for millimetre-wave systems: Couplers, filters, antennas, MMIC packaging. International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation. 243–246.28 indexed citations
Alfonso, E., Mariano Baquero-Escudero, Alejandro Valero‐Nogueira, José I. Herranz-Herruzo, & Per-Simon Kildal. (2010). Power divider in ridge gap waveguide technology. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 1–4.20 indexed citations
Alfonso, E., Per-Simon Kildal, Alejandro Valero‐Nogueira, & José I. Herranz-Herruzo. (2009). Numerical analysis of a metamaterial-based ridge gap waveguide with a bed of nails as parallel-plate mode killer. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology). 23–27.14 indexed citations
13.
Vico, Felipe, et al.. (2009). Second order fast Physical Optics. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation. 159–162.
Alfonso, E., et al.. (2008). Detection of local quasi-TEM waves in oversized waveguides with one hard wall for killing higher order global modes. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).10 indexed citations
17.
Alfonso, E., et al.. (2006). Slot Array Fed by an Oversized TEM Waveguide. ESASP. 626. 425.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.