D.P. de Vries
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Cell Biology
- Biochemistry
- Co-authors
- L.A.M. DuboisT. VisserL. SmeetsJ. J. VerhaeghCharlotte H. Hänisch ten CateHans J. M. DonsG.W.H. WellesAlex Koot
- Topics
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (31 papers)Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (24 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
D.P. de Vries
51 papers receiving 482 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Plant Science 510
- Molecular Biology 378
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 119
- Cell Biology 79
- Biochemistry 28
Countries citing papers authored by D.P. de Vries
This map shows the geographic impact of D.P. de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.P. de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.P. de Vries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D.P. de Vries
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.P. de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.P. de Vries. The network helps show where D.P. de Vries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.P. de Vries
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.P. de Vries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.P. de Vries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.P. de Vries. D.P. de Vries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | Re-invigoration of clonal rose rootstocks by sustained micropropagation | 5 |
| 4 | The effect of pinching on the growth and development of Rosa chinensis minima (Sims) Voss cultivars | 1 |
| 5 | Impartial assessment of rose (Rosa, 'Sweet Promise') flower colour with the aid of a chromameter | 1 |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | Shoot production of 'Sonia' on hybrid tea rootstock clones of different vigour. | 11 |
| 8 | Rose rootstocks on the move. | 1 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About D.P. de Vries
D.P. de Vries is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 58 papers that have together received 604 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (31 papers), Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (24 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (510 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (119 citations) and Molecular Biology (378 citations). D.P. de Vries has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include L.A.M. Dubois, T. Visser, L. Smeets, J. J. Verhaegh, Charlotte H. Hänisch ten Cate, Hans J. M. Dons, G.W.H. Welles, Alex Koot, Frida Garretsen and Jan de Jong. Their work appears in journals such as Scientia Horticulturae, Euphytica and Plant Growth Regulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.