Douglas Gifford
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Anthropology
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- Co-authors
- Robert L. KindrickCairns CraigAndrew HookSarah DunniganPeter Boyd‐BowmanKeith WhinnomAlan Riach
- Topics
- Scottish History and National Identity (8 papers)Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (5 papers)Archaeological and Historical Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Douglas Gifford
11 papers receiving 36 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- History 34
- Sociology and Political Science 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 18
- Anthropology 8
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 7
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Gifford
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Gifford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Gifford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Gifford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Gifford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Gifford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Gifford. The network helps show where Douglas Gifford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Gifford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Gifford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Gifford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Gifford. Douglas Gifford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Sham Bards of a Sham Nation?: Edwin Muir and the Failures of Scottish Literature | 1 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Scotlands: poets and the nation | 2 |
| 5 | Scottish Literature in English and Scots | 5 |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | The History of Scottish Literature | 21 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Carnival and coca leaf: Some traditions of the Peruvian Quechua Ayllu | 8 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Neil M. Gunn : the man and the writer | 1 |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | Scottish short stories, 1800-1900 | 0 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Un antiguo texto en Vascuence | 1 |
About Douglas Gifford
Douglas Gifford is a scholar working on History, Language and Linguistics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 78 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Scottish History and National Identity (8 papers), Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (5 papers) and Archaeological and Historical Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (34 citations), Museology (6 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (18 citations). Douglas Gifford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Kindrick, Cairns Craig, Andrew Hook, Sarah Dunnigan, Peter Boyd‐Bowman, Keith Whinnom and Alan Riach. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, World Literature Today and Folklore.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.