Douglas G. Mitchell

734 citations
38 papers · 597 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Douglas G. Mitchell

37 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Douglas G. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Analytical Chemistry 219
  • Bioengineering 89
  • Electrochemistry 86
  • Spectroscopy 155
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 40
Replace R. C. Fry with:
R. C. Fry United States
J. Agterdenbos Netherlands
Dennis A. Yates United States
Oscar Menis United States
F.J. de Boer Netherlands
B. Neidhart Germany
A. Le Bihan France
Klaus Doerffel Germany
R.K. Winge United States
H. Malissa Germany
Douglas G. Mitchell relative to R. C. Fry United States R. C. Fry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
R. C. Fry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas G. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas G. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas G. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas G. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas G. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas G. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas G. Mitchell. The network helps show where Douglas G. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas G. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas G. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Douglas G. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980103
2 197053
3 197542
4 197341
5 197430
6 197327
7 197427
8 200327
9 197723
10 198222
11 197120
12 199220
13 197719
14 197314
15 197213
16 197710
17 19759
18 19758
19 19728
20 19757

About Douglas G. Mitchell

Douglas G. Mitchell is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Spectroscopy, Bioengineering and Electrochemistry, having authored 38 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical chemistry methods development (14 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (6 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (2 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (2 papers) and Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (219 citations), Bioengineering (89 citations), Electrochemistry (86 citations), Spectroscopy (155 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (40 citations). Douglas G. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth M. Aldous, Kenneth W. Jackson, Axel Johansson, John Rankin, S.R. Wild, Kevin C. Jones, Frank W. Newell, B.R. Sandel, M. G. Henderson and M. F. Thomsen. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Analytica Chimica Acta, Clinical Chemistry, Environmental Health Perspectives and Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact