Doug Sanders

1.1k total citations
14 papers, 159 citations indexed

About

Doug Sanders is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Doug Sanders has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 159 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Management Information Systems, 8 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 3 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Doug Sanders's work include Quality and Supply Management (8 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (3 papers). Doug Sanders is often cited by papers focused on Quality and Supply Management (8 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers) and Manufacturing Process and Optimization (3 papers). Doug Sanders collaborates with scholars based in United States. Doug Sanders's co-authors include Richard D. Sanders, Morris Hamburg, Robert A. McLean, Pierre Bayle and Thomas P. Ryan and has published in prestigious journals such as Technometrics and Quality Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Doug Sanders

13 papers receiving 119 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Doug Sanders United States 7 85 62 59 21 17 14 159
Genett Jiménez‐Delgado Colombia 9 70 0.8× 84 1.4× 35 0.6× 11 0.5× 29 1.7× 17 193
Donald S. Barrie United States 5 38 0.4× 65 1.0× 202 3.4× 10 0.5× 26 1.5× 8 330
Avigdor Zonnenshain Israel 6 114 1.3× 69 1.1× 19 0.3× 14 0.7× 138 8.1× 28 247
Héctor Rivera-Gómez Mexico 12 143 1.7× 146 2.4× 18 0.3× 51 2.4× 108 6.4× 29 385
Anupam Haldar India 7 136 1.6× 254 4.1× 172 2.9× 15 0.7× 15 0.9× 8 375
Robisom Damasceno Calado Brazil 6 115 1.4× 81 1.3× 46 0.8× 4 0.2× 18 1.1× 38 185
Carlos Franco Colombia 7 72 0.8× 68 1.1× 26 0.4× 5 0.2× 17 1.0× 27 193
Lincoln H. Forbes United States 6 71 0.8× 52 0.8× 163 2.8× 7 0.3× 21 1.2× 18 234
Ilaria De Sanctis Italy 8 222 2.6× 206 3.3× 41 0.7× 14 0.7× 76 4.5× 13 307
Don Tapping 7 171 2.0× 106 1.7× 69 1.2× 3 0.1× 74 4.4× 11 258

Countries citing papers authored by Doug Sanders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doug Sanders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doug Sanders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doug Sanders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doug Sanders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doug Sanders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doug Sanders. The network helps show where Doug Sanders may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doug Sanders

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doug Sanders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doug Sanders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doug Sanders. Doug Sanders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2012). A Graphical Tool for Detection of Outliers in Completely Randomized, Unreplicated 2kand 2k-PFactorials. Quality Engineering. 24(4). 514–521. 2 indexed citations
2.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2007). Transactional Six Sigma: Is It Really Different?. 7. 1 indexed citations
3.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2003). Recognition and Importance of Restrictions on Randomization in Industrial Experimentation. Quality Engineering. 15(4). 533–543. 6 indexed citations
4.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2002). Randomized Complete Block Designs in Industrial Studies. Quality Engineering. 14(1). 1–8. 6 indexed citations
5.
Bayle, Pierre, et al.. (2001). ILLUSTRATION OF SIX SIGMA* ASSISTANCE ON A DESIGN PROJECT. Quality Engineering. 13(3). 341–348. 6 indexed citations
6.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2001). SIX SIGMA* ON CONTINUOUS PROCESSES: HOW AND WHY IT DIFFERS. Quality Engineering. 13(1). 1–9. 19 indexed citations
7.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2000). SIX SIGMA∗ON BUSINESS PROCESSES: COIVIMON ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES. Quality Engineering. 12(4). 603–610. 31 indexed citations
8.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2000). COMMON MYTHS ABOUT SIX SIGMA. Quality Engineering. 13(2). 269–276. 10 indexed citations
9.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (2000). A DISCUSSION OF STRATEGIES FOR SIX SIGMA∗ IMPLEMENTATION. Quality Engineering. 12(3). 303–309. 42 indexed citations
10.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (1999). CONSIDERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH RESTRICTIONS ON RANDOMIZATION IN INDUSTRIAL EXPERIMENTATION. Quality Engineering. 12(1). 57–64. 1 indexed citations
11.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (1999). THE PROCESS MAP. Quality Engineering. 11(4). 555–561. 10 indexed citations
12.
Sanders, Doug, et al.. (1999). THE THOUGHT MAP. Quality Engineering. 12(1). 21–27. 5 indexed citations
13.
Sanders, Richard D., et al.. (1994). THE ANALYTIC EXAMINATION OF TIME-DEPENDENT VARIANCE COMPONENTS. Quality Engineering. 7(2). 315–336. 10 indexed citations
14.
Hamburg, Morris, et al.. (1980). General Applied Statistics. Technometrics. 22(4). 634–634. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026