Dorothy Field

1.1k total citations
30 papers, 763 citations indexed

About

Dorothy Field is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dorothy Field has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 763 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dorothy Field's work include Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers). Dorothy Field is often cited by papers focused on Aging and Gerontology Research (9 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers). Dorothy Field collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Dorothy Field's co-authors include Meredith Minkler, Roger E. Millsap, E. Victor Leino, Guy E. Swanson, Philip A. Cowan, Arlene Skolnick, Donald A. Hansen, K. Warner Schaie, Mark A. Fine and Sarah Hall Gueldner and has published in prestigious journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Child Development and Journal of Marriage and the Family.

In The Last Decade

Dorothy Field

29 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dorothy Field United States	16	212	210	203	177	171	30	763
Martin B. Loeb United States	3	188 0.9×	210 1.0×	220 1.1×	117 0.7×	158 0.9×	12	758
Ronald H. Aday United States	19	461 2.2×	126 0.6×	204 1.0×	234 1.3×	235 1.4×	39	933
Dominique L. Debats Netherlands	13	145 0.7×	487 2.3×	255 1.3×	53 0.3×	81 0.5×	16	1.0k
Julie Erickson United States	14	145 0.7×	164 0.8×	89 0.4×	116 0.7×	24 0.1×	21	803
Lindsay Pitzer United States	18	518 2.4×	192 0.9×	263 1.3×	218 1.2×	77 0.5×	41	1.3k
B. Gail Frankel Canada	13	282 1.3×	246 1.2×	193 1.0×	79 0.4×	25 0.1×	19	784
Peter Tavel Czechia	17	207 1.0×	279 1.3×	274 1.3×	42 0.2×	68 0.4×	107	1.0k
Victoria Hilkevitch Bedford United States	14	416 2.0×	111 0.5×	272 1.3×	309 1.7×	96 0.6×	19	715
William H. Quinn United States	17	186 0.9×	263 1.3×	96 0.5×	58 0.3×	36 0.2×	54	812
Martha Holstein United States	11	221 1.0×	61 0.3×	183 0.9×	223 1.3×	260 1.5×	28	705

Countries citing papers authored by Dorothy Field

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothy Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothy Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothy Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothy Field

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothy Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothy Field. The network helps show where Dorothy Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dorothy Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dorothy Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dorothy Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dorothy Field. Dorothy Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Field, Dorothy, et al.. (2006). Postoperative Endophthalmitis: Caution is the Watchword. Journal of Perioperative Practice. 16(1). 16–20. 2 indexed citations

Field, Dorothy. (2004). Moving from novice to expert – the value of learning in clinical practice: a literature review. Nurse Education Today. 24(7). 560–565. 77 indexed citations

Field, Dorothy & Sarah Hall Gueldner. (2001). THE OLDEST-OLD: How Do They Differ from the Old-Old?. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 27(8). 20–27. 15 indexed citations

Field, Dorothy, et al.. (1999). Ophthalmic chloramphenicol: A review of the literature. Accident and Emergency Nursing. 7(1). 13–17. 2 indexed citations

Field, Dorothy. (1999). A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Continuity and Change in Social Relations in Old Age: Introduction to a Special Issue. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 48(4). 257–261. 2 indexed citations

Field, Dorothy, et al.. (1997). Internet Policies: Managing in the Real World. [and] One Library's Approach: Pornography? Not in Our Library!.. American libraries. 28(10). 63. 1 indexed citations

Field, Dorothy. (1997). “Looking Back, What Period of Your Life Brought You the Most Satisfaction”. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 45(3). 169–194. 16 indexed citations

Lee, Gary R., Philip A. Cowan, Dorothy Field, et al.. (1994). Family, Self, and Society: Toward a New Agenda for Family Research.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 23(5). 706–706. 30 indexed citations

Field, Dorothy, Meredith Minkler, Richard Falk, & E. Victor Leino. (1993). The Influence of Health on Family Contacts and Family Feelings in Advanced Old Age: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Gerontology. 48(1). P18–P28. 28 indexed citations

10.

Field, Dorothy. (1991). Continuity and Change in Personality in Old Age--Evidence From Five Longitudinal Studies: Introduction to a Special Issue. Journal of Gerontology. 46(6). P271–P274. 8 indexed citations

11.

Field, Dorothy & Roger E. Millsap. (1991). Personality in Advanced Old Age: Continuity or Change?. Journal of Gerontology. 46(6). P299–P308. 88 indexed citations

12.

Field, Dorothy & Meredith Minkler. (1988). Continuity and Change in Social Support Between Young-old and Old-old or Very-old Age. Journal of Gerontology. 43(4). P100–P106. 146 indexed citations

13.

Field, Dorothy, K. Warner Schaie, & E. Victor Leino. (1988). Continuity in intellectual functioning: The role of self-reported health.. Psychology and Aging. 3(4). 385–392. 23 indexed citations

14.

Field, Dorothy & K. Warner Schaie. (1985). Life Satisfaction and Intellectual Functioning: Continuity between Young-Old, Old-Old, and Very-Old Age.. Bioactive Materials. 21. 299–312. 1 indexed citations

15.

Field, Dorothy, et al.. (1984). Marriages over Half a Century: A Longitudinal Study.. 3 indexed citations

16.

Field, Dorothy, et al.. (1983). Consistency of Personal and Intellectual Characteristics over Half a Century.. 2 indexed citations

17.

Field, Dorothy. (1981). Can Preschool Children Really Learn to Conserve?. Child Development. 52(1). 326–326. 19 indexed citations

18.

Field, Dorothy. (1981). Retrospective Reports by Healthy Intelligent Elderly People of Personal Events of their Adult Lives. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 4(1). 77–97. 50 indexed citations

19.

Field, Dorothy. (1977). The Importance of the Verbal Content in the Training of Piagetian Conservation Skills. Child Development. 48(4). 1583–1583. 12 indexed citations

20.

Field, Dorothy. (1974). Long-Term Effects of Conservation Training with Educationally Subnormal Children. The Journal of Special Education. 8(3). 237–245. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact