Dorothy E. Dean

606 citations
27 papers · 478 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Papers in

Dorothy E. Dean

25 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Dorothy E. Dean
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Toxicology 55
  • Small Animals 45
  • Transplantation 16
  • Emergency Medicine 55
  • Archeology 48
Replace Tetsuji Miyazaki with:
Tetsuji Miyazaki Japan
Cristina Robalo Cordeiro Portugal
Mamoru Ogata Japan
William F. Walby United States
Daniele Risser Austria
Hideki Shojo Japan
A. Pekkarinen Finland
K.‐U. Kühn Germany
Tadahide Totoki Japan
Jay Miller United States
Dorothy E. Dean relative to Tetsuji Miyazaki Japan Tetsuji Miyazaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tetsuji Miyazaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dorothy E. Dean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothy E. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothy E. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothy E. Dean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothy E. Dean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothy E. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothy E. Dean. The network helps show where Dorothy E. Dean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dorothy E. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dorothy E. Dean Line = papers co-authored together Dorothy E. Dean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999121
2 199671
3 200537
4 201031
5 202130
6 201127
7 201223
8 201119
9 196217
10 201815
11 200314
12 196912
13 200911
14 200411
15 199910
16 19977
17
Emotional abuse of children.
19795
18 20113
19 20143
20 19643

About Dorothy E. Dean

Dorothy E. Dean is a scholar working on Toxicology, Small Animals, Emergency Medicine, Insect Science and Surgery, having authored 27 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (5 papers), Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (4 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (3 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (2 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (55 citations), Small Animals (45 citations), Transplantation (16 citations), Emergency Medicine (55 citations) and Archeology (48 citations). Dorothy E. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include T Rabinowicz, Gabrielle M. de Courten‐Myers, Robert H. Powers, Jeremy Rich, D. A. Devitt, Robert L. Morris, John F. Wyman, Nathalie A. Desrosiers, James H. Watterson and Yvonne Y. Cheung. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Forensic Sciences, Analytical Chemistry, Transplantation, Journal of Analytical Toxicology and Injury.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact