Dorothy D. Tucker
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma 3
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 3
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 1
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 1
- Gambling Behavior and Treatments 1
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 1
- Health top 10%
- Safety Research top 10%
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 2
-
- Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse 1
- Co-authors
- William A. AltemeierMary S. DietrichRobert M. BraydenPeter M. VietzeKathryn B. SherrodMaurizio FavaPaola PedrelliSidney Zisook
- Journals
- The Journal of Pediatrics (2 papers)Psychopathology (2 papers)Journal of Personality Assessment (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyCameroon
In The Last Decade
Dorothy D. Tucker
8 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Clinical Psychology 298
- Applied Psychology 43
- Health 58
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
- Safety Research 31
Countries citing papers authored by Dorothy D. Tucker
This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothy D. Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothy D. Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothy D. Tucker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothy D. Tucker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothy D. Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothy D. Tucker. The network helps show where Dorothy D. Tucker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dorothy D. Tucker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 110 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 53 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 55 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 49 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 38 |
About Dorothy D. Tucker
Dorothy D. Tucker is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (1 paper), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper) and Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (298 citations), Applied Psychology (43 citations), Health (58 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations) and Safety Research (31 citations). Dorothy D. Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Cameroon. Frequent co-authors include William A. Altemeier, Mary S. Dietrich, Robert M. Brayden, Peter M. Vietze, Kathryn B. Sherrod, Maurizio Fava, Paola Pedrelli, Sidney Zisook, Patrick S. Calhoun and Jean C. Beckham. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Pediatrics, Psychopathology, Journal of Personality Assessment, Child Abuse & Neglect and Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.