Doris Voelker

1.0k total citations
8 papers, 789 citations indexed

About

Doris Voelker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Doris Voelker has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 789 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 3 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Doris Voelker's work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers). Doris Voelker is often cited by papers focused on Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (3 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers) and Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers). Doris Voelker collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Canada. Doris Voelker's co-authors include Stefan Scholz, Stephan Fischer, Ulrike Gündel, Eberhard Küster, Till Luckenbach, Kristin Schirmer, Robert Geisler, Roland Nagel, Georg Otto and Michaela Tillmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Developmental Biology, Environmental Science and Pollution Research and Environmental Research.

In The Last Decade

Doris Voelker

8 papers receiving 773 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Doris Voelker Germany 8 348 190 178 156 120 8 789
Yongfang Jia China 8 270 0.8× 124 0.7× 145 0.8× 121 0.8× 66 0.6× 16 699
Subham Dasgupta United States 18 411 1.2× 152 0.8× 120 0.7× 96 0.6× 45 0.4× 37 788
Wan-Ping Bian China 14 261 0.8× 404 2.1× 137 0.8× 145 0.9× 146 1.2× 21 1.0k
Katerine S. Saili United States 11 452 1.3× 147 0.8× 165 0.9× 77 0.5× 70 0.6× 15 857
Jianghuan Hua China 15 341 1.0× 136 0.7× 268 1.5× 68 0.4× 147 1.2× 25 738
Biran Zhu China 16 459 1.3× 128 0.7× 203 1.1× 99 0.6× 154 1.3× 42 842
Yingren Li China 17 632 1.8× 155 0.8× 405 2.3× 107 0.7× 41 0.3× 25 1.1k
Katharine A. Horzmann United States 13 312 0.9× 203 1.1× 134 0.8× 232 1.5× 32 0.3× 25 765
Leah C. Wehmas United States 18 386 1.1× 186 1.0× 260 1.5× 69 0.4× 183 1.5× 35 983
Lilai Yuan China 22 636 1.8× 195 1.0× 373 2.1× 81 0.5× 43 0.4× 37 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Voelker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Voelker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Voelker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Voelker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Voelker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Voelker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Voelker. The network helps show where Doris Voelker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doris Voelker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doris Voelker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doris Voelker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doris Voelker. Doris Voelker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Berkner, Silvia, Kathrin Schwirn, & Doris Voelker. (2022). Too advanced for assessment? Advanced materials, nanomedicine and the environment. Environmental Sciences Europe. 34(1). 71–71. 8 indexed citations
2.
Schwirn, Kathrin, et al.. (2020). Environmental Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials in the Light of New Obligations Under the REACH Regulation: Which Challenges Remain and How to Approach Them?. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 16(5). 706–717. 33 indexed citations
3.
Voelker, Doris, et al.. (2015). Approach on environmental risk assessment of nanosilver released from textiles. Environmental Research. 140. 661–672. 56 indexed citations
4.
Berkner, Silvia, Kathrin Schwirn, & Doris Voelker. (2015). Nanopharmaceuticals: Tiny challenges for the environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 35(4). 780–787. 12 indexed citations
5.
Schlosser, Gerhard, Samantha A. Brugmann, Eric D. Jensen, et al.. (2008). Eya1 and Six1 promote neurogenesis in the cranial placodes in a SoxB1-dependent fashion. Developmental Biology. 320(1). 199–214. 87 indexed citations
6.
Scholz, Stefan, Stephan Fischer, Ulrike Gündel, et al.. (2008). The zebrafish embryo model in environmental risk assessment—applications beyond acute toxicity testing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 15(5). 394–404. 464 indexed citations
7.
Voelker, Doris, Michaela Tillmann, Roland Nagel, et al.. (2007). Differential gene expression as a toxicant-sensitive endpoint in zebrafish embryos and larvae. Aquatic Toxicology. 81(4). 355–364. 104 indexed citations
8.
Voelker, Doris, et al.. (2007). The role of cyp1a and heme oxygenase 1 gene expression for the toxicity of 3,4-dichloroaniline in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Aquatic Toxicology. 86(1). 112–120. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026