Doris Fok
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Yap Seng ChongKeith M. GodfreyWei Wei PangKok Hian TanLinlin SuMary RauffYiong‐Huak ChanPeter D. Gluckman
- Topics
- Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (16 papers)Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (6 papers)Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Doris Fok
16 papers receiving 492 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Epidemiology 316
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 176
- Psychiatry and Mental health 175
- Nutrition and Dietetics 168
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 146
Countries citing papers authored by Doris Fok
This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Fok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Fok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Fok more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Fok
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Fok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Fok. The network helps show where Doris Fok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Doris Fok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Doris Fok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Doris Fok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Doris Fok. Doris Fok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 50 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 134 | |
| 19 | breast feeding: randomised controlled trial strategies for improving rates of exclusive Antenatal education and postnatal support | 1 |
About Doris Fok
Doris Fok is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Epidemiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (16 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (6 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (98 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (175 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (168 citations). Doris Fok has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Yap Seng Chong, Keith M. Godfrey, Wei Wei Pang, Kok Hian Tan, Linlin Su, Mary Rauff, Yiong‐Huak Chan, Peter D. Gluckman, Seang‐Mei Saw and Kenneth Kwek. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, BMJ and Nutrients.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.