Donna C. Burdzy
About
In The Last Decade
Donna C. Burdzy
3 papers receiving 732 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Health 540
- Clinical Psychology 346
- Sociology and Political Science 271
- Social Psychology 199
- General Health Professions 105
Countries citing papers authored by Donna C. Burdzy
This map shows the geographic impact of Donna C. Burdzy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna C. Burdzy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna C. Burdzy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donna C. Burdzy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna C. Burdzy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna C. Burdzy. The network helps show where Donna C. Burdzy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donna C. Burdzy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donna C. Burdzy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donna C. Burdzy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donna C. Burdzy. Donna C. Burdzy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Brief RCOPE: Current Psychometric Status of a Short Measure of Religious Coping breakdown → | 699 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 68 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.