This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Scragg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Scragg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Scragg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Scragg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Scragg. The network helps show where Donald Scragg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald Scragg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald Scragg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald Scragg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Donald Scragg. Donald Scragg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lucas, Peter W., Sam Lucy, Rory Naismith, et al.. (2016). ASE volume 45 Cover and Front matter. Anglo-Saxon England. 45. f1–f13.1 indexed citations
2.
Treharne, Elaine, et al.. (2016). Textiles, Text, Intertext: Essays in Honour of Gale R. Owen-Crocker.1 indexed citations
3.
Lapidge, Michael, et al.. (2008). "The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Anglo–Saxon England", red. Michael Lapidge, John Blair, Simon Keynes, Donald Scragg, Oxford 2004 : [recenzja] / Paweł Derecki.. 46.4 indexed citations
4.
Hall, Thomas N., Donald Scragg, & Helmut Gneuss. (2008). Anglo-Saxon Books and Their Readers: Essays in Celebration of Helmut Gneuss's Handlist of Anglo-Saxon Manuscripts. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
Scragg, Donald. (2006). The Return of the Vikings: The Battle of Maldon 991. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
7.
Scragg, Donald, et al.. (2003). Apocryphal texts and traditions in Anglo-Saxon England. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association.5 indexed citations
8.
Scragg, Donald. (2003). Textual and material culture in Anglo-Saxon England : Thomas Northcote Toller and the Toller memorial lectures.10 indexed citations
9.
Scragg, Donald. (2003). Standard Old English: Scribal Practices in the Eleventh Century. Scientia Insularum Revista de Ciencias Naturales en islas. 47(47). 37–44.1 indexed citations
10.
Lapidge, Michael, et al.. (2001). The Blackwell encyclopaedia of Anglo-Saxon England. Blackwell eBooks.26 indexed citations
11.
Scragg, Donald. (2001). Standard Old English and the Study of English in the Eleventh Century. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 35.1 indexed citations
Scragg, Donald. (2000). Literary Appropriations of the Anglo-Saxons from the Thirteenth the Twentieth Century. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).
14.
Scragg, Donald, et al.. (1994). The editing of Old English : papers from the 1990 Manchester conference.14 indexed citations
15.
Scragg, Donald. (1994). The Editing of Old English. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).7 indexed citations
16.
Scragg, Donald. (1992). The Vercelli Homilies and Related Texts. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).57 indexed citations
17.
Scragg, Donald. (1981). The Battle of Maldon. Manchester University Press eBooks.38 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.