Donald M. Crider
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Fern K. WillitsWilliam R. HutchisonConrad L. KanagyJames PeacockHarry K. SchwarzwellerDavid M. Byers
- Topics
- Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers)Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Donald M. Crider
19 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Sociology and Political Science 158
- Health 126
- Social Psychology 56
- General Health Professions 40
- Clinical Psychology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Donald M. Crider
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald M. Crider's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald M. Crider with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald M. Crider more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald M. Crider
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald M. Crider. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald M. Crider. The network helps show where Donald M. Crider may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald M. Crider
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald M. Crider. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald M. Crider based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald M. Crider. Donald M. Crider is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | Health rating and life satisfaction in the later middle years. | 50 |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Respondent Retrieval Bias in a Longitudinal Survey. | 4 |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | Locating People in Longitudinal Studies. A Research Report and Suggested Guidelines. | 1 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Donald M. Crider
Donald M. Crider is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Religious studies and Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (126 citations), Sociology and Political Science (158 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (5 citations). Donald M. Crider has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Fern K. Willits, William R. Hutchison, Conrad L. Kanagy, James Peacock, Harry K. Schwarzweller and David M. Byers. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Public Opinion Quarterly and Social Indicators Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.