Donald J. Kyle
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ronald M. BurchSarvajit ChakravartyQiang ZhengJoão Β. CalixtoLaykea TafesseJennifer A. MartinKenneth J. ValenzanoVictor I. Ilyin
- Topics
- Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (19 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (14 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical InvestigationThe Journal of Chemical Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Donald J. Kyle
57 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Molecular Biology 897
- Genetics 476
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 440
- Physiology 323
- Organic Chemistry 214
Countries citing papers authored by Donald J. Kyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald J. Kyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald J. Kyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald J. Kyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald J. Kyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald J. Kyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald J. Kyle. The network helps show where Donald J. Kyle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald J. Kyle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald J. Kyle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald J. Kyle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald J. Kyle. Donald J. Kyle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 90 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 74 |
About Donald J. Kyle
Donald J. Kyle is a scholar working on Genetics, Sensory Systems and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (19 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (14 papers) and Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (476 citations), Sensory Systems (190 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (440 citations). Donald J. Kyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ronald M. Burch, Sarvajit Chakravarty, Qiang Zheng, João Β. Calixto, Laykea Tafesse, Jennifer A. Martin, Kenneth J. Valenzano, Victor I. Ilyin, Stephen G. Farmer and Chongwu Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Investigation and The Journal of Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.