Donald E. Fosket

2.8k total citations
53 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Donald E. Fosket is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Donald E. Fosket has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Plant Science, 32 papers in Molecular Biology and 11 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Donald E. Fosket's work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (13 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (12 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (10 papers). Donald E. Fosket is often cited by papers focused on Plant tissue culture and regeneration (13 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (12 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (10 papers). Donald E. Fosket collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Donald E. Fosket's co-authors include Louis C. Morejohn, L. C. Morejohn, Peter K. Hepler, John G. Torrey, Thomas E. Bureau, A. Bajer, Lorin W. Roberts, David Tepfer, Eldon H. Newcomb and Mark J. Guiltinan and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Donald E. Fosket

53 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Donald E. Fosket United States 27 1.5k 1.5k 449 180 116 53 2.2k
Kristi R. Harkins United States 18 2.1k 1.4× 1.6k 1.1× 148 0.3× 447 2.5× 77 0.7× 27 2.7k
Benjamin C. Lu Canada 25 983 0.7× 1.1k 0.8× 440 1.0× 185 1.0× 33 0.3× 59 1.7k
Hiroh Shibaoka Japan 39 2.7k 1.8× 2.4k 1.6× 995 2.2× 219 1.2× 139 1.2× 85 3.4k
Roger I. Pennell United Kingdom 18 3.5k 2.3× 2.2k 1.5× 164 0.4× 214 1.2× 235 2.0× 30 4.0k
M. J. Chrispeels United States 24 1.5k 1.0× 1.3k 0.9× 233 0.5× 65 0.4× 216 1.9× 30 2.2k
Marjatta Raudaskoski Finland 29 1.4k 0.9× 1.3k 0.9× 469 1.0× 270 1.5× 33 0.3× 82 2.0k
Robert Otillar United States 5 897 0.6× 1.2k 0.8× 403 0.9× 98 0.5× 55 0.5× 5 2.0k
Paulo Cavalcanti Gomes Ferreira Brazil 31 2.9k 2.0× 1.9k 1.2× 237 0.5× 234 1.3× 51 0.4× 63 3.6k
Juliet W. Welch United States 21 559 0.4× 1.1k 0.7× 186 0.4× 66 0.4× 113 1.0× 26 1.6k
Julie V. Cullimore France 39 3.8k 2.5× 1.3k 0.9× 131 0.3× 64 0.4× 79 0.7× 82 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Fosket

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Fosket's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Fosket with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Fosket more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Fosket

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Fosket. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Fosket. The network helps show where Donald E. Fosket may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald E. Fosket

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald E. Fosket. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald E. Fosket based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald E. Fosket. Donald E. Fosket is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Han, In‐Seob, et al.. (1994). Hypocotyl expression and light downregulation of the soybean tubulin gene, tubB1. The Plant Journal. 5(3). 343–351. 19 indexed citations
2.
Fosket, Donald E.. (1994). Plant Growth and Development: A Molecular Approach. 67 indexed citations
3.
Han, In‐Seob, et al.. (1991). Limited expression of a diverged ?-tubulin gene during soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) development. Plant Molecular Biology. 16(2). 225–234. 28 indexed citations
4.
Morejohn, Louis C. & Donald E. Fosket. (1991). The biochemistry of compounds with anti-microtubule activity in plant cells. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 51(2). 217–230. 107 indexed citations
5.
Bustos, Mauricio M., et al.. (1989). Light Regulation of β-Tubulin Gene Expression during Internode Development in Soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.). PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 91(3). 1157–1161. 26 indexed citations
6.
Cyr, Richard J., Mauricio M. Bustos, Mark J. Guiltinan, & Donald E. Fosket. (1987). Developmental modulation of tubulin protein and mRNA levels during somatic embryogenesis in cultured carrot cells. Planta. 171(3). 365–376. 44 indexed citations
7.
Morejohn, L. C., et al.. (1987). Oryzalin, a dinitroaniline herbicide, binds to plant tubulin and inhibits microtubule polymerization in vitro. Planta. 172(2). 252–264. 317 indexed citations
8.
9.
Morejohn, Louis C., et al.. (1984). Tubulins from different higher plant species are immunologically nonidentical and bind colchicine differentially. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 81(5). 1440–1444. 79 indexed citations
10.
Morejohn, L. C. & Donald E. Fosket. (1984). Taxol-induced rose microtubule polymerization in vitro and its inhibition by colchicine.. The Journal of Cell Biology. 99(1). 141–147. 56 indexed citations
11.
Morejohn, Louis C. & Donald E. Fosket. (1984). Inhibition of Plant Microtubule Polymerization in vitro by the Phosphoric Amide Herbicide Amiprophos-Methyl. Science. 224(4651). 874–876. 119 indexed citations
12.
Gendel, Steven M. & Donald E. Fosket. (1978). Differential rates of DNA denaturation and renaturation in situ in relation to the C-banding of Allium cepa chromosomes.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 21(82). 91–101. 3 indexed citations
13.
Gendel, Steven M., Donald E. Fosket, & Jerome P. Miksche. (1977). Increasing White Ash Seed Germination by Embryo Dissection. 220. 1 indexed citations
14.
Fosket, Donald E. & K. C. Short. (1973). The Role of Cytokinin in the Regulation of Growth, DNA Synthesis and Cell Proliferation in Cultured Soybean Tissues (Glycine max var. Biloxi). Physiologia Plantarum. 28(1). 14–23. 23 indexed citations
15.
Torrey, John G., Donald E. Fosket, & Peter K. Hepler. (1971). Xylem Formation: A Paradigm of Cytodifferentiation in Higher Plants. American Scientist. 59(3). 338–352. 82 indexed citations
16.
Hepler, Peter K., Donald E. Fosket, & Eldon H. Newcomb. (1970). LIGNIFICATION DURING SECONDARY WALL FORMATION IN COLEUS: AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPIC STUDY. American Journal of Botany. 57(1). 85–96. 103 indexed citations
17.
Fosket, Donald E.. (1970). The Time Course of Xylem Differentiation and Its Relation to Deoxyribonucleic Acid Synthesis in Cultured Coleus Stem Segments. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 46(1). 64–68. 19 indexed citations
18.
Fosket, Donald E. & John G. Torrey. (1969). Hormonal Control of Cell Proliferation and Xylem Differentiation in Cultured Tissues of Glycine max var. Biloxi. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 44(6). 871–880. 80 indexed citations
19.
Fosket, Donald E. & Jerome P. Miksche. (1966). Protein Synthesis as a Requirement for Wound Xylem Differentiation. Physiologia Plantarum. 19(4). 982–991. 5 indexed citations
20.
Fosket, Donald E. & Lorin W. Roberts. (1964). Induction of Wound-Vessel Differentiation in Isolated Coleus Stem Segments In vitro. American Journal of Botany. 51(1). 19–19. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026