Donald E. Fosket
- Plant Science top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Louis C. MorejohnL. C. MorejohnPeter K. HeplerJohn G. TorreyThomas E. BureauA. BajerLorin W. RobertsDavid Tepfer
- Topics
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration (13 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (12 papers)Plant Molecular Biology Research (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaGermany
In The Last Decade
Donald E. Fosket
53 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Plant Science 1.5k
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
- Cell Biology 449
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 180
- Food Science 116
Countries citing papers authored by Donald E. Fosket
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald E. Fosket's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald E. Fosket with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald E. Fosket more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donald E. Fosket
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald E. Fosket. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald E. Fosket. The network helps show where Donald E. Fosket may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald E. Fosket
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald E. Fosket. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald E. Fosket based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald E. Fosket. Donald E. Fosket is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 107 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 317 | |
| 7 | 55 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 119 | |
| 10 | 79 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | Differential rates of DNA denaturation and renaturation in situ in relation to the C-banding of Allium cepa chromosomes. | 3 |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | Xylem Formation: A Paradigm of Cytodifferentiation in Higher Plants | 82 |
| 15 | 103 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 80 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Donald E. Fosket
Donald E. Fosket is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (13 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (12 papers) and Plant Molecular Biology Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.5k citations), Cell Biology (449 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.5k citations). Donald E. Fosket has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Louis C. Morejohn, L. C. Morejohn, Peter K. Hepler, John G. Torrey, Thomas E. Bureau, A. Bajer, Lorin W. Roberts, David Tepfer, Eldon H. Newcomb and Mark J. Guiltinan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.