Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer
19561.2k citationsDonald ColesJournal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
Transition in circular Couette flow
1965802 citationsDonald ColesJournal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
An experimental study of entrainment and transport in the turbulent near wake of a circular cylinder
1983731 citationsBrian Cantwell, Donald ColesJournal of Fluid Mechanicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Coles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Coles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Coles more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Coles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Coles. The network helps show where Donald Coles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald Coles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald Coles.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald Coles based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Donald Coles. Donald Coles is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Coles, Donald. (1984). On one mechanism of turbulence production in coherent structures. 397–402.2 indexed citations
7.
Cantwell, Brian & Donald Coles. (1983). An experimental study of entrainment and transport in the turbulent near wake of a circular cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 136. 321–374.731 indexed citations breakdown →
Coles, Donald, et al.. (1978). The flying hot wire and related instrumentation. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 79. 11352.7 indexed citations
11.
Collins, Donald J., et al.. (1978). Measurements in the turbulent boundary layer at constant pressure in subsonic and supersonic flow. Part 1: Mean flow. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).10 indexed citations
12.
Cantwell, Brian, Donald Coles, & Paul E. Dimotakis. (1977). Anatomy of a turbulent spot. The Physics of Fluids. 20(10). S291–S291.1 indexed citations
13.
Coles, Donald. (1971). A Survey of Data for Turbulent Boundary Layers With Mass Transfer. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).16 indexed citations
14.
Coles, Donald. (1969). Turbulent Boundary Layers in Pressure Gradients: A Survey Lecture Prepared for the 1968 AFOSR-IFP — Stanford Conference on Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers.5 indexed citations
Coles, Donald. (1956). The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1(2). 191–226.1202 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.