Donald C. Mead

24 papers receiving 894 citations

Hit Papers

The dynamics of micro and small enterprises in developing...19982026200720161998100200300400500

Peers

Donald C. Mead
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Economics and Econometrics 760
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 377
  • Accounting 326
  • Business and International Management 294
  • Sociology and Political Science 155
Replace Gerrit de Wit with:
Gerrit de Wit Netherlands
Julia Korosteleva United Kingdom
Pamela Mueller Germany
Ruta Aidis United Kingdom
Lawrence A. Plummer United States
Javed Hussain United Kingdom
Gary E. Willard United States
Lars Persson Sweden
Theodore A. Khoury United States
Catherine Armington United States
Donald C. Mead relative to Gerrit de Wit Netherlands Gerrit de Wit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Gerrit de Wit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donald C. Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald C. Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald C. Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald C. Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald C. Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald C. Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald C. Mead. The network helps show where Donald C. Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald C. Mead

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald C. Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald C. Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donald C. Mead. Donald C. Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Building Businesses with Small Producers: Successful Business Development Services in Africa, Asia, and Latin America
6
2 65
3
Business linkages in Zimbabwe: helping to shape 'win-win' economic structures
6
4 19
5 90
6
Employment and income in micro and small enterprises in Kenya : results of a 1995 survey
30
7 89
8 6
9 65
10 2
11 2
12 42
13 31
14 9
15 1
16 2
17 24
18 1
19 2
20 2

About Donald C. Mead

Donald C. Mead is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Accounting, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (7 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (6 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (294 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (377 citations) and Accounting (326 citations). Donald C. Mead has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Carl Liedholm, Christian Morrisson, Lisa Daniels, Steven Haggblade, Stephen Davies, E. R. J. Owen, Charles Machethe, Thomas Reardon, Michelle L. Berger and Sam Moyo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Economy, World Development and American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026