Don S. Ellis
- Dermatology top 5%
- Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques 2
- Oral Surgery top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 1
-
- Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research 4
-
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 5
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 3
- Head and Neck Surgical Oncology 2
-
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies 2
-
- Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting 1
- Co-authors
- William StewartBryant A. TothClinton D. McCordPeter S. LevinWilliam H. SpencerJohn R. HeckenlivelyDavid L. RimoinNadia Sakati
- Cited by
- DermatologyOral SurgeryOphthalmology
- Journals
- Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (5 papers)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (5 papers)American Journal of Ophthalmology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaChina
In The Last Decade
Don S. Ellis
15 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Dermatology 87
- Oral Surgery 46
- Ophthalmology 54
- Neurology 77
- Surgery 191
Countries citing papers authored by Don S. Ellis
This map shows the geographic impact of Don S. Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don S. Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don S. Ellis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Don S. Ellis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don S. Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don S. Ellis. The network helps show where Don S. Ellis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Don S. Ellis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 26 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 10 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 16 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 52 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 40 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 82 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 38 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 2 |
About Don S. Ellis
Don S. Ellis is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Dermatology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (5 papers), Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research (4 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (3 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (2 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (2 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (1 paper) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (87 citations), Oral Surgery (46 citations) and Ophthalmology (54 citations). Don S. Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include William Stewart, Bryant A. Toth, Clinton D. McCord, Peter S. Levin, William H. Spencer, John R. Heckenlively, David L. Rimoin, Nadia Sakati, Ralph S. Lachman and Wayne E. Fung. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology and Retina.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.