Dominique Fetzer

737 total citations
17 papers, 224 citations indexed

About

Dominique Fetzer is a scholar working on Genetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Dominique Fetzer has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 224 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Dominique Fetzer's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (16 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (5 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers). Dominique Fetzer is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (16 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (5 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers). Dominique Fetzer collaborates with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Dominique Fetzer's co-authors include Brian L. Egleston, Linda Patrick‐Miller, Angela R. Bradbury, Andrea Forman, Mary B. Daly, Susan M. Domchek, Jill E. Stopfer, Amanda Brandt, Linda Patrick‐Miller and Linda Fleisher and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Research and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

In The Last Decade

Dominique Fetzer

13 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dominique Fetzer United States 9 159 85 52 40 37 17 224
Sandrine de Montgolfier France 9 104 0.7× 87 1.0× 39 0.8× 37 0.9× 59 1.6× 39 225
James O’Leary United States 9 152 1.0× 84 1.0× 28 0.5× 55 1.4× 21 0.6× 13 274
Robin Lee United States 9 198 1.2× 40 0.5× 46 0.9× 48 1.2× 39 1.1× 15 305
Julie Rousseau United States 7 142 0.9× 56 0.7× 65 1.3× 41 1.0× 15 0.4× 17 220
Ingeborg Blancquaert Canada 9 175 1.1× 71 0.8× 59 1.1× 42 1.1× 16 0.4× 12 292
Patti Vegella United States 6 236 1.5× 53 0.6× 90 1.7× 28 0.7× 71 1.9× 7 430
Hetal S. Vig United States 7 213 1.3× 60 0.7× 57 1.1× 38 0.9× 48 1.3× 9 267
Ellen Otten Netherlands 7 182 1.1× 86 1.0× 45 0.9× 34 0.8× 13 0.4× 7 311
Niki M. Medendorp Netherlands 9 72 0.5× 83 1.0× 35 0.7× 100 2.5× 33 0.9× 15 258
Amanda Brandt United States 9 198 1.2× 67 0.8× 69 1.3× 29 0.7× 48 1.3× 19 292

Countries citing papers authored by Dominique Fetzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dominique Fetzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominique Fetzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominique Fetzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dominique Fetzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominique Fetzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominique Fetzer. The network helps show where Dominique Fetzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominique Fetzer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominique Fetzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominique Fetzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dominique Fetzer. Dominique Fetzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Fetzer, Dominique, Brian L. Egleston, Susan M. Domchek, et al.. (2024). Developing the MyCancerGene Digital Health Portal to Improve Patients’ Understanding of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results: Development, User, and Usability Testing Study. JMIR Formative Research. 9. e56282–e56282.
2.
Egleston, Brian L., Lily Hoffman‐Andrews, H Griffin, et al.. (2024). Facilitating return of actionable genetic research results from a biobank repository: Participant uptake and utilization of digital interventions. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. 5(4). 100346–100346.
4.
Egleston, Brian L., Dominique Fetzer, Colleen Burke Sands, et al.. (2021). Randomized study of remote telehealth genetic services versus usual care in oncology practices without genetic counselors. Cancer Medicine. 10(13). 4532–4541. 12 indexed citations
5.
Bradbury, Angela R., Brian L. Egleston, Linda Patrick‐Miller, et al.. (2020). Longitudinal outcomes with cancer multigene panel testing in previously tested BRCA1/2 negative patients. Clinical Genetics. 97(4). 601–609. 8 indexed citations
6.
Gaieski, Jill B., Linda Patrick‐Miller, Brian L. Egleston, et al.. (2019). Research participants’ experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web‐based alternatives. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 7(9). e898–e898. 20 indexed citations
7.
Bradbury, Angela R., Linda Patrick‐Miller, Brian L. Egleston, et al.. (2018). Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer. JCO Precision Oncology. 2(2). 1–24. 19 indexed citations
8.
Bradbury, Angela R., Jill B. Gaieski, Brian L. Egleston, et al.. (2018). Interest in and outcomes with web-based education for return of genetic research results for inherited susceptibility to breast cancer.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 36(15_suppl). 1531–1531.
9.
Bradbury, Angela R., Linda Patrick‐Miller, Diana Harris, et al.. (2016). Utilizing Remote Real-Time Videoconferencing to Expand Access to Cancer Genetic Services in Community Practices: A Multicenter Feasibility Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 18(2). e23–e23. 75 indexed citations
10.
Bradbury, Angela R., Linda Patrick‐Miller, Brian L. Egleston, et al.. (2016). Patient-reported outcomes in a multicenter randomized study of in-person versus telephone disclosure of genetic test results for cancer susceptibility.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 34(15_suppl). 1502–1502.
11.
Patrick‐Miller, Linda, Brian L. Egleston, Dominique Fetzer, et al.. (2014). Development of a Communication Protocol for Telephone Disclosure of Genetic Test Results for Cancer Predisposition. JMIR Research Protocols. 3(4). e49–e49. 16 indexed citations
12.
Patrick‐Miller, Linda, Brian L. Egleston, Mary B. Daly, et al.. (2013). Implementation and outcomes of telephone disclosure of clinical BRCA1/2 test results. Patient Education and Counseling. 93(3). 413–419. 17 indexed citations
13.
Patrick‐Miller, Linda, et al.. (2010). Genetic counselor opinions of, and experiences with telephone communication of BRCA1/2 test results. Clinical Genetics. 79(2). 125–131. 37 indexed citations
14.
Patrick‐Miller, Linda, et al.. (2009). Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results? Opinions of recipients of BRCA1/2 testing.. Cancer Research. 69(2_Supplement). 2098–2098. 2 indexed citations
15.
Patrick‐Miller, Linda, et al.. (2009). Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results: a survey of genetic counselors.. Cancer Research. 69(2_Supplement). 1098–1098. 2 indexed citations
16.
Patrick‐Miller, Linda, et al.. (2009). Telephone disclosure of BRCA1/2 test results? Experience and opinions of genetic counselors and consumers. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 27(15_suppl). 1510–1510. 1 indexed citations
17.
Masny, Agnes, et al.. (2008). Mentoring Nurses in Familial Cancer Risk Assessment and Counseling: Lessons Learned From a Formative Evaluation. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 17(2). 196–207. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026