Ruth Bingler

552 total citations
7 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Ruth Bingler is a scholar working on Genetics, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Bingler has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Genetics, 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Ruth Bingler's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (2 papers). Ruth Bingler is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (5 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (2 papers). Ruth Bingler collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Ruth Bingler's co-authors include Susan Montgomery, Mary B. Daly, Karen Ruth, Andrea M. Barsevick, Maureen W. McClatchey, Linda Fleisher, Susan Baum, Debra S. Heller, Neal R. Boyd and John Malick and has published in prestigious journals such as Preventive Medicine, Journal of Family Psychology and Familial Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Bingler

7 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ruth Bingler United States	7	251	100	95	82	74	7	449
Ting Hsiang Lin United States	8	389 1.5×	93 0.9×	78 0.8×	201 2.5×	120 1.6×	11	638
Anna Chan United States	9	184 0.7×	53 0.5×	51 0.5×	90 1.1×	55 0.7×	17	400
Tatiane Yanes Australia	14	326 1.3×	26 0.3×	84 0.9×	37 0.5×	76 1.0×	43	565
Cora Honing Netherlands	5	71 0.3×	70 0.7×	66 0.7×	62 0.8×	38 0.5×	6	466
Beth A. Fine United States	10	194 0.8×	29 0.3×	83 0.9×	48 0.6×	90 1.2×	18	401
John M. Quillin United States	17	319 1.3×	21 0.2×	115 1.2×	111 1.4×	106 1.4×	53	635
Aliya Collier United States	12	258 1.0×	19 0.2×	137 1.4×	63 0.8×	60 0.8×	16	456
Álvaro Mendes Portugal	14	405 1.6×	37 0.4×	137 1.4×	137 1.7×	116 1.6×	48	627
Susanne F. Meisel United Kingdom	16	221 0.9×	21 0.2×	119 1.3×	39 0.5×	19 0.3×	27	560
Joanna Dundon United Kingdom	5	295 1.2×	10 0.1×	87 0.9×	97 1.2×	75 1.0×	5	462

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Bingler

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Bingler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Bingler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Bingler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Bingler

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Bingler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Bingler. The network helps show where Ruth Bingler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Bingler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Bingler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Bingler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Bingler. Ruth Bingler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Giri, Veda N., Elias Obeid, Colette Hyatt, et al.. (2017). Inherited Mutations in Men Undergoing Multigene Panel Testing for Prostate Cancer: Emerging Implications for Personalized Prostate Cancer Genetic Evaluation. JCO Precision Oncology. 1(1). 1–17. 49 indexed citations

2.

Daly, Mary B., Susan Montgomery, Ruth Bingler, & Karen Ruth. (2016). Communicating genetic test results within the family: Is it lost in translation? A survey of relatives in the randomized six-step study. Familial Cancer. 15(4). 697–706. 78 indexed citations

3.

Montgomery, Susan, Andrea M. Barsevick, Brian L. Egleston, et al.. (2013). Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial. Familial Cancer. 12(3). 537–546. 74 indexed citations

4.

Barsevick, Andrea M., Susan Montgomery, Karen Ruth, et al.. (2008). Intention to communicate BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic test results to the family.. Journal of Family Psychology. 22(2). 303–312. 39 indexed citations

5.

Daly, Mary B., Andrea M. Barsevick, Suzanne M. Miller, et al.. (2001). Communicating Genetic Test Results to the Family. Family & Community Health. 24(3). 13–26. 61 indexed citations

6.

Boyd, Neal R., Maureen W. McClatchey, Ruth Bingler, et al.. (1998). Quit Today!A Targeted Communications Campaign to Increase Use of the Cancer Information Service by African American Smokers. Preventive Medicine. 27(5). S50–S60. 54 indexed citations

7.

Boyd, Neal R., Ruth Bingler, Diane Fairclough, et al.. (1998). A Self-Help Intervention for African American Smokers: Tailoring Cancer Information Service Counseling for a Special Population. Preventive Medicine. 27(5). S61–S70. 94 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact