Dolly Menna‐Dack

536 total citations
11 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

Dolly Menna‐Dack is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Dolly Menna‐Dack has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Dolly Menna‐Dack's work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (4 papers). Dolly Menna‐Dack is often cited by papers focused on Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers) and Disability Education and Employment (4 papers). Dolly Menna‐Dack collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Dolly Menna‐Dack's co-authors include Sally Lindsay, Carolyn McDougall, Tracey L. Adams, Shauna Kingsnorth, Johanna Darrah, Barbara E. Gibson, Rose Martini, Debra Cameron, Goli Hashemi and Angela Mandich and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, JAMA Network Open and Disability and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Dolly Menna‐Dack

10 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dolly Menna‐Dack Canada 7 130 68 54 53 52 11 283
Esther Murphy Ireland 10 56 0.4× 73 1.1× 55 1.0× 68 1.3× 24 0.5× 19 284
Pedro Gutiérrez-Recacha Spain 7 89 0.7× 118 1.7× 19 0.4× 38 0.7× 72 1.4× 7 286
Christian Wendelborg Norway 10 92 0.7× 103 1.5× 72 1.3× 20 0.4× 25 0.5× 39 325
Angela N. Amado United Kingdom 8 155 1.2× 160 2.4× 48 0.9× 35 0.7× 31 0.6× 26 325
Julie Loblinzk Australia 11 107 0.8× 77 1.1× 37 0.7× 33 0.6× 6 0.1× 16 232
Aleksa Owen United States 11 112 0.9× 187 2.8× 27 0.5× 20 0.4× 19 0.4× 21 321
Wendy Parent United States 12 223 1.7× 78 1.1× 47 0.9× 79 1.5× 32 0.6× 19 387
Katherine J. Inge United States 12 229 1.8× 68 1.0× 63 1.2× 159 3.0× 37 0.7× 51 399
Sandra M. Leotti United States 7 47 0.4× 117 1.7× 66 1.2× 13 0.2× 32 0.6× 17 239
Jane M. Everson United States 10 162 1.2× 104 1.5× 25 0.5× 42 0.8× 18 0.3× 23 275

Countries citing papers authored by Dolly Menna‐Dack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dolly Menna‐Dack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dolly Menna‐Dack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dolly Menna‐Dack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dolly Menna‐Dack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dolly Menna‐Dack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dolly Menna‐Dack. The network helps show where Dolly Menna‐Dack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dolly Menna‐Dack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dolly Menna‐Dack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dolly Menna‐Dack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dolly Menna‐Dack. Dolly Menna‐Dack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Oh, Anna, et al.. (2024). Facilitating virtual social connections for youth with disabilities: lessons for post-COVID-19 programming. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(22). 5253–5262.
2.
Tanel, Nadia, Julia Kowal, Gillian King, et al.. (2023). Delivery and evaluation of simulations to promote authentic and meaningful engagement in childhood disability research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 9(1). 54–54. 3 indexed citations
3.
Stephenson, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2023). Perspectives of Youths on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Research and Clinical Care. JAMA Network Open. 6(5). e2310659–e2310659. 27 indexed citations
4.
Tanel, Nadia, et al.. (2022). Codesigning simulations and analyzing the process to ascertain principles of authentic and meaningful research engagement in childhood disability research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 8(1). 60–60. 9 indexed citations
5.
King, Gillian, et al.. (2022). A case study of a strategic initiative in pediatric rehabilitation transition services: An insiders' perspective on team principles and practices. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 999973–999973. 1 indexed citations
6.
Seko, Yukari, et al.. (2021). Integrating lived experience into clinical practice: a case study of young peer providers in pediatric rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation. 44(23). 7246–7254. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lindsay, Sally, et al.. (2016). Applying an ecological framework to understand transition pathways to post-secondary education for youth with physical disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation. 40(3). 277–286. 30 indexed citations
11.
Gibson, Barbara E., Johanna Darrah, Debra Cameron, et al.. (2009). Revisiting therapy assumptions in children's rehabilitation: clinical and research implications. Disability and Rehabilitation. 31(17). 1446–1453. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026