Docia Demmin

25 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Docia Demmin
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Ophthalmology 144
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 182
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 141
  • Philosophy 55
Replace Mallory J. Klaunig with:
Mallory J. Klaunig United States
Kentaro Morita Japan
Viola Oertel Germany
Thierry Rochet France
Elizabeth Squires‐Wheeler United States
Eka Chkonia Georgia
Francesca Benassi Italy
Volkan Topçuoğlu Türkiye
Craig E. Hou United States
Gricel Orellana Chile
Docia Demmin relative to Mallory J. Klaunig United States Mallory J. Klaunig's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.6×
Mallory J. Klaunig · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Docia Demmin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Docia Demmin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Docia Demmin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Docia Demmin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Docia Demmin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Docia Demmin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Docia Demmin. The network helps show where Docia Demmin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Docia Demmin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Docia Demmin Line = papers co-authored together Docia Demmin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020148
2 201970
3 201668
4 201863
5 202044
6 201726
7 201723
8 201915
9 202214
10 201514
11 201913
12 201911
13 20208
14 20186
15 20195
16 20204
17
Visual Impairments in Schizophrenia: Their Significance and Unrealized Clinical Potential.
20204
18 20132
19 20182
20 20171

About Docia Demmin

Docia Demmin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Ophthalmology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (9 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (144 citations), Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (182 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (141 citations) and Philosophy (55 citations). Docia Demmin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven M. Silverstein, Jesse Schallek, Barbara A. Cornblatt, Borut Škodlar, Ricardo E. Carrión, Ruth Olsen, Todd Lencz, Andrea M. Auther, Christoph U. Correll and Danielle McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, Journal of Parkinson s Disease, Journal of Psychiatric Research and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact