Docia Demmin

25 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Docia Demmin
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 151
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Ophthalmology 79
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 117
  • Philosophy 38
Replace Francesca Benassi with:
Francesca Benassi Italy
Elizabeth Squires‐Wheeler United States
Gricel Orellana Chile
Sidhant Chopra Australia
Craig E. Hou United States
Eric A. Reavis United States
S. Lottenberg United States
Boris Karpov Finland
Rachel Bloom United States
Ronald G. Paulman United States
Docia Demmin relative to Francesca Benassi Italy Francesca Benassi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
Francesca Benassi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Docia Demmin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Docia Demmin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Docia Demmin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Docia Demmin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Docia Demmin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Docia Demmin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Docia Demmin. The network helps show where Docia Demmin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Docia Demmin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Docia Demmin Line = papers co-authored together Docia Demmin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020157
2 201972
3 201671
4 201865
5 202046
6 201726
7 201723
8 201916
9 201515
10 202214
11 201914
12 201911
13 20209
14 20186
15 20196
16 20204
17
Visual Impairments in Schizophrenia: Their Significance and Unrealized Clinical Potential.
20204
18 20182
19 20132
20 20201

About Docia Demmin

Docia Demmin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (151 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations), Ophthalmology (79 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (117 citations) and Philosophy (38 citations). Docia Demmin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven M. Silverstein, Jesse Schallek, Ruth Olsen, Borut Škodlar, Barbara A. Cornblatt, Ricardo E. Carrión, Todd Lencz, Christoph U. Correll, Andrea M. Auther and Danielle McLaughlin. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Schizophrenia Research, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact