D.M. Bishop

441 total citations
27 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

D.M. Bishop is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, D.M. Bishop has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Insect Science, 12 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 10 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in D.M. Bishop's work include Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Study of Mite Species (7 papers) and Helminth infection and control (7 papers). D.M. Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Study of Mite Species (7 papers) and Helminth infection and control (7 papers). D.M. Bishop collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, India and Switzerland. D.M. Bishop's co-authors include Allen Heath, A. C. G. Heath, A. Pfeffer, M. J. Daniel, J.H. Niezen, Abdul Moeed, T. G. Watson, Colin M. Miskelly and Ben D. Bell and has published in prestigious journals such as Veterinary Parasitology, Medical and Veterinary Entomology and New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research.

In The Last Decade

D.M. Bishop

25 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D.M. Bishop New Zealand 11 196 97 90 71 70 27 346
A. C. G. Heath New Zealand 12 155 0.8× 125 1.3× 170 1.9× 63 0.9× 116 1.7× 35 403
April Hari Wardhana Indonesia 11 172 0.9× 91 0.9× 85 0.9× 44 0.6× 82 1.2× 69 410
R. Velusamy India 12 125 0.6× 76 0.8× 123 1.4× 60 0.8× 144 2.1× 59 419
E. C. Loomis United States 10 131 0.7× 195 2.0× 39 0.4× 79 1.1× 76 1.1× 32 336
R. Zeledón Costa Rica 11 303 1.5× 66 0.7× 79 0.9× 23 0.3× 97 1.4× 28 595
Ahmet Onur Girişgin Türkiye 10 175 0.9× 124 1.3× 48 0.5× 65 0.9× 150 2.1× 46 377
José Maria Soares Barata Brazil 18 338 1.7× 61 0.6× 46 0.5× 71 1.0× 113 1.6× 56 832
Ana Laura Carbajal-de-la-Fuente Argentina 14 299 1.5× 37 0.4× 49 0.5× 28 0.4× 61 0.9× 44 537
Octávio Alves Ferreira Brazil 19 267 1.4× 37 0.4× 86 1.0× 29 0.4× 121 1.7× 28 616
Rajmund Sokół Poland 12 200 1.0× 138 1.4× 56 0.6× 52 0.7× 190 2.7× 73 461

Countries citing papers authored by D.M. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.M. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.M. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.M. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.M. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.M. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.M. Bishop. The network helps show where D.M. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.M. Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.M. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.M. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.M. Bishop. D.M. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Miskelly, Colin M., Ben D. Bell, & D.M. Bishop. (2023). Changes in a New Zealand wetland bird community following creation of a predator-fenced sanctuary. Notornis. 70(4). 160–160.
3.
Watson, T. G., et al.. (1996). Efficacy of injectable doramectin against naturally acquired louse infestations on cattle. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 39(3). 401–404. 2 indexed citations
4.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1996). The development of cockle, a sheep pelt defect, in relation to size of infestation and time of exposure to Bovicola ovis, the sheep-biting louse. Veterinary Parasitology. 67(3-4). 259–267. 15 indexed citations
5.
Bishop, D.M., et al.. (1996). Distribution, prevalence and host associations of Hymenoptera parasitic on Calliphoridae occurring in flystrike in New Zealand. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 10(4). 365–370. 21 indexed citations
6.
Pfeffer, A., et al.. (1996). Detection of dermatophilosis and lice (Bovicola ovis) on flayed pelts and cockle on the skin of live lambs. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 44(4). 121–125. 7 indexed citations
7.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1995). Preliminary investigations into the aetiology and treatment of cockle, a sheep pelt defect. Veterinary Parasitology. 56(1-3). 239–254. 33 indexed citations
8.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1995). Evidence for the role of the sheep biting-louse Bovicola ovis in producing cockle, a sheep pelt defect. Veterinary Parasitology. 59(1). 53–58. 20 indexed citations
9.
Niezen, J.H., et al.. (1992). A pilot evaluation of shedding sheep breeds compared with non-shedding breeds for susceptibility to nematodes and flystrike.. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 52. 233–235. 10 indexed citations
10.
Heath, A. C. G., et al.. (1992). Some currently available insecticides and their comparative efficacy on louse-infested, long-woolled sheep. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 40(3). 101–103. 9 indexed citations
11.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1992). An evaluation of two cypermethrin-based pour-on formulations on sheep infested with the biting louse,Bovicola ovis. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 40(3). 104–106. 3 indexed citations
12.
Heath, A. C. G., et al.. (1989). Observations on the potential for natural transfer ofPsoropfes cuniculiandChorioptes bovis(Atari : Psoroptidae) between goats and sheep. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 37(2). 56–58. 12 indexed citations
13.
Heath, A. C. G. & D.M. Bishop. (1988). Evaluation of two ‘pour‐on’ insecticides against the sheep‐biting louse, Bovicola ovis and the sheep ked, Melophagus ovinus. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 31(1). 9–12. 9 indexed citations
14.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1988). Bird hosts of the New Zealand cattle tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 15(4). 585–586. 7 indexed citations
15.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1987). Goats, hares, and rabbits as hosts for the New Zealand cattle tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis *. New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 14(4). 549–555. 25 indexed citations
16.
Heath, Allen, D.M. Bishop, & M. J. Daniel. (1987). A new laelapine genus and species (Acari: Laelapidae) from the short‐tailed bat Mystacina tuberculata , in New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 17(1). 31–39. 5 indexed citations
17.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1987). Mite infestation (Acari: Laelapidae) of New Zealand short‐tailed bats, Mystacina tuberculata , in captivity. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. 17(1). 41–47. 4 indexed citations
18.
Heath, Allen, et al.. (1987). The effects of artificially-induced fly-strike on food intake and liveweight gain in sheep. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 35(4). 50–52. 23 indexed citations
20.
Heath, A. C. G., et al.. (1980). Effects of pour‐on organophosphate insecticides and a diamidide acaricide on the cattle tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 8(1). 79–87. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026