500 total citations 11 papers, 387 citations indexed
About
D.J. Pinckney is a scholar working on Oceanography, Ecology and Food Science.
According to data from OpenAlex, D.J. Pinckney has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 387 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Oceanography, 5 papers in Ecology and 3 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in D.J. Pinckney's work include Isotope Analysis in Ecology (5 papers), Marine and environmental studies (5 papers) and Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (3 papers). D.J. Pinckney is often cited by papers focused on Isotope Analysis in Ecology (5 papers), Marine and environmental studies (5 papers) and Food Industry and Aquatic Biology (3 papers). D.J. Pinckney collaborates with scholars based in United States and Philippines. D.J. Pinckney's co-authors include Robert L. Wershaw, E. Michael Thurman, Ronald L. Malcolm, Victoria A. Vicente‐Beckett, Kevin A. Thorn and Marvin C. Goldberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Water Resources Research and Analytica Chimica Acta.
Citations per year, relative to D.J. Pinckney D.J. Pinckney (= 1×)
peers
Masood Ghassemi
Countries citing papers authored by D.J. Pinckney
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of D.J. Pinckney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.J. Pinckney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.J. Pinckney more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.J. Pinckney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.J. Pinckney. The network helps show where D.J. Pinckney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.J. Pinckney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.J. Pinckney.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.J. Pinckney based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D.J. Pinckney. D.J. Pinckney is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Thurman, E. Michael, Robert L. Wershaw, Ronald L. Malcolm, & D.J. Pinckney. (1982). Molecular size of aquatic humic substances. Organic Geochemistry. 4(1). 27–35.257 indexed citations
Wershaw, Robert L. & D.J. Pinckney. (1977). Chemical structure of humic acids - Part 2, the molecular aggregation of some humic acid fractions in N, N-dimethylformamide. Journal research U. S. geological survey. 5(5). 571–577.3 indexed citations
6.
Wershaw, Robert L., et al.. (1977). Chemical structure of humic acids - Part 1, a generalized structural model. Journal research U. S. geological survey. 5(5). 565–569.16 indexed citations
7.
Wershaw, Robert L., et al.. (1975). Pyrrolidone - a new solvent for the methylation of humic acid. Journal research U. S. geological survey. 3(1). 123–126.1 indexed citations
8.
Pinckney, D.J. & Robert L. Wershaw. (1973). Determination of the association and dissociation of humic acid fractions by small angle X-ray scattering. Journal research U. S. geological survey. 1(6). 701–707.18 indexed citations
9.
Wershaw, Robert L. & D.J. Pinckney. (1973). The fractionation of humic acids from natural water systems. Journal research U. S. geological survey. 1(3). 361–366.18 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.