Dirkie Smit
- Water Science and Technology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Religious studies top 1%
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Topics
- Christian Theology and Mission (27 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (21 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaChemical Engineering ScienceAIChE Journal
- Partner nations
- South AfricaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dirkie Smit
38 papers receiving 462 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Water Science and Technology 243
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- Religious studies 104
- Computational Mechanics 98
- Biomedical Engineering 79
Countries citing papers authored by Dirkie Smit
This map shows the geographic impact of Dirkie Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dirkie Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dirkie Smit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dirkie Smit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dirkie Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dirkie Smit. The network helps show where Dirkie Smit may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dirkie Smit
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dirkie Smit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dirkie Smit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dirkie Smit. Dirkie Smit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Barmen and Belhar in conversation - a South African perspective : Barmen en Belhar | 0 |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | The resurrection of Jesus - what was it? Plurality and ambiguity in the Christian resurrection hope | 2 |
| 19 | Responsible hermeneutics: a systematic theologian's response to the readings and readers of Luke 12:35-48 | 7 |
| 20 | A moment of truth : the confession of the Dutch Reformed Mission Church | 22 |
About Dirkie Smit
Dirkie Smit is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Christian Theology and Mission (27 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (21 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (104 citations), Water Science and Technology (243 citations) and Computational Mechanics (98 citations). Dirkie Smit has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Hounslow, W. R. Paterson and P.J. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Chemical Engineering Science and AIChE Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.