Diogo Morais
- Human-Computer Interaction top 2%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Jorge OliveiraPedro GamitoPedro J. RosaRodrigo BritoPaulo LopesNuno C. SantosMargarida Gaspar de MatosDiana Silva
- Topics
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (12 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Diogo Morais
40 papers receiving 697 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Human-Computer Interaction 220
- Rehabilitation 183
- Cognitive Neuroscience 160
- Psychiatry and Mental health 130
- Epidemiology 105
Countries citing papers authored by Diogo Morais
This map shows the geographic impact of Diogo Morais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diogo Morais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diogo Morais more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diogo Morais
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diogo Morais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diogo Morais. The network helps show where Diogo Morais may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diogo Morais
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diogo Morais. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diogo Morais based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diogo Morais. Diogo Morais is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 42 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 48 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | Training presence: the importance of virtual reality experience on the "sense of being there". | 13 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | The Use of VR Exposure in the Treatment of Motor Vehicle PTSD: A Case-report | 10 |
About Diogo Morais
Diogo Morais is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Rehabilitation and Applied Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (12 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (220 citations), Rehabilitation (183 citations) and Applied Psychology (78 citations). Diogo Morais has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Jorge Oliveira, Pedro Gamito, Pedro J. Rosa, Rodrigo Brito, Paulo Lopes, Nuno C. Santos, Margarida Gaspar de Matos, Diana Silva, Gonçalo G. Pereira and Liliana de Sousa. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.